Part 2 – Little Red Motherhood and the Teenage Wolf
My 13½ year-old son recently had his first real "girlfriend." It lasted about 2 weeks, until she decided she liked his best friend more. His best friend, a 15 year-old, was currently her best friend's boyfriend. So it goes in adolescent relationships today. When this was going on, my wife made a simple but profound statement: It must be a really difficult age for boys. Just what does a 13 year-old boy have to offer a 14 year-old girl? It was a rhetorical question because we both knew the answer – nothing! Girls of that age are much more mature than boys of the same age, and generally attracted to the older boys. Sure, they hook up and play at relationships, but that is only due to convenience. They simply don't belong together.
*As an update: the particular girl in the story soon worked her way from the
15 year-old "best friend" to a 16 year-old sophomore, then
quickly on to a 17 year-old junior, once they were in "High"
School.
Now here's a question for you, and if you are completely
indoctrinated in Kultamerica, it's certain that you will not only
have an Orwellian reaction to the mere phrase used, but a Pavlovian
response to my answer, as well. The question is:
"Why do teenage girls get pregnant?"
The answer is:
"BECAUSE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO!"
Despite the fact that we've been continually bombarded with over 50
years of insidious propaganda that "teenage pregnancy" is
some sort of horrific PROBLEM, all of humanity owes its existence to
teenage pregnancy. Throughout most of human history people followed
the natural biological patterns and rhythms that exist within our
instincts, and most cultures that developed were in sync with our
biological natures.
The fact that we now exist within a Kulture that is antithetical to
our human nature doesn't mitigate the fact that human biology doesn't
evolve just because someone, or a group of people, decides it should.
Industry, feminism, corporatism, eugenics, etc., have coerced the
general population to turn away from the natural order of human
development and reproduction as a matter of Kulture, while our
biological bodies and instincts remain steadfast and true to Nature.
So what is the REAL problem with teenage females getting pregnant in
Kultamerica (aside from the contrived Kultural mores? THEY ARE
USUALLY IMPREGNATED BY TEENAGE MALES!
When the father is not a teenage male, in this Kulture he is often deemed a "sex offender." By LAW, we are NOT ALLOWED to procreate as the biology of the species dictates we should.
"I'm, like, gonna be a dad?"
When the father is not a teenage male, in this Kulture he is often deemed a "sex offender." By LAW, we are NOT ALLOWED to procreate as the biology of the species dictates we should.
Hypothesis
The Natural Human Development regarding Reproduction differs in AGE
according to GENDER as expressed in Phi Ratio, Golden Mean, Fibonacci
Whole Number approximations representing age, in years. It expresses
as such in Phi Harmonics when the gender Fibonacci cycles are set to
match at ages 13 Female and 21 Male.
*See Part 1 – Means and Harmonics for graphs and explanations of
Phi Harmonics with the aforementioned offset.
What this implies is a socio-economic solution to many of the social
ills of today, merely by following a more Natural Path in regard to
human reproduction and gender roles.
Gender Roles
The primary role of a woman is Mother. The primary role of a man is Provider. It is only within the Industrial Paradigm that a Female can be “provider,” and even then, without the Male, at quite the cost to society. It must be an un-natural world in which the Female can be provider. However,our Biologies, our BODIES, come from the NATURAL world – Kulture has evolved in a direction away from Nature … to our own misfortune. Even if the biological goal was to evolve toward Androgyny, culture would evolve at a much faster rate (however, it is not biology’s goal to evolve toward androgyny; rather, biology has evolved away from asexual reproduction and become MORE specialized sexually). Fight biology as much as you want, Kulturally, but biology and Nature WILL eventually win out.
Our Kulture has become so removed from
the natural world, that it has become quite easy to assume unnatural
identities, oddities, and ludicrous beliefs (i.e., a third
gender arising, gay "marriage," – propagandist poppycock
to further the downward spiral). Despite the vain attempts of
Kulture to change the natural order of things, Men will remain
stronger, more adept at the physical rigors of survival, and will
never be substitutes for a good Mother. Women will retain their
Maternal instincts – however fiercely the Kulture tries to beat it
out of them – and will remain irreplaceable if we are to survive as
a species.
As it follows, Men, in order to be good
providers, must have something to offer vis- a-vis provision
and protection. A 27 year-old man, if he is not stuck in the altered
state of protracted adolescence, will ALWAYS be a better mate for a
woman than a 17 year-old boy. Assuming a natural course, the
adolescent male must go out in the world and make something of
himself before he takes a mate. In years past, this was not a
question. A woman of child-bearing age would not give a boy the time
of day, she would only consider a man of means, however meager the
means.
As it stands today, the standard is a
man of the same age. If this mating occurs when the two are both in
the 13-21 Cycle, the Male is in no way fit to provide and protect,
due partly to the lack of prefrontal cortex development. If this
occurs later, with both in the 21-34 F Cycle, the woman is past the
optimal time for becoming a mother, partly due to the full
development of the prefrontal cortex.
The Piano Lesson
There are
certain stages of development that certain things are easier, more
natural, to master. A great example of this is learning to play the
piano. It is generally accepted that kids learn to play the piano
easiest if they start around 8 years old, and it becomes
significantly harder after 12 years old (of course, there are
exceptions, but this is the general rule). There are those numbers
AGAIN!
"Piano For Kids"
"The timing of the start of piano lessons and the selection of a teacher that is right for your child are very important in the success of piano lessons."
------------------------------------------------------------
"Public schools usually begin their instrumental programs around 3rd or 4th grade, when most children have reached a good place to learn music in their emotional, physical, and educational development. This is a reasonably safe time to start piano lessons for just about any child.Source: http://voices.yahoo.com/the-right-age-begin-piano-lessons-2817226.html
However, many children want to take lessons even earlier because of a favorite artist, an older sibling, or just a passion for music that they have. Many children are perfectly capable of starting private piano lessons even earlier than 3rd grade."
Now, the significance of this relating to this hypothesis is that there are certain age-specific times in human development at which learning to master a skill set is optimal. Why would it be any different when it comes to parenting? It is my contention that the optimal time for a Female to first become a Mother is during the 13-21 Fibonacci cycle. This has everything to do with 1) the ABILITY to conceive after the onset on menses, but, 2) before the full development of the prefrontal cortex. Like learning to play the piano well, learning to be a good Mother is much easier if done within this optimal age "window," before which, it is physically impossible, and after which, it is intellectually more difficult (this is assuming a Natural culture exists which is supportive of the teenage Mother; obviously, with the current Kultural stigma and socio-economic demands of Industry, the mental side of teenage pregnancy is skewed).
The Prefrontal Cortex
The prefrontal cortex is the part of
the brain that assists in rational decision making. It becomes fully
developed around 21 years old.
[*21 again. Now, it seems that
there is some dispute over this. There was a time not long ago, that
"scientists" thought the brain was fully developed at 14.
Later, they found out about the development of the prefrontal cortex
between 14 and 21 (hmmm ... there's that cycle again). Most
recently, "scientists" are claiming that the prefrontal
cortex continues to develop until the age of 25 ... now, this just
happens to coincide with a time of extremely protracted adolescence
due to Kulture. In my opinion, this is propaganda to further
protract adolescence, and they are using the extremes to define the
means. I think there is evidence to support this in the 2nd
article quoted below, in which the title quote claims 25, but the
very next paragraph indicates 21. It is quite possible that some,
probably a very few, people don't have a fully developed prefrontal
cortex until 25, but this number is negligible. Also, on the
cognitive tests they used to formulate this theory, the fact that
people answer the questions as if their brains aren't fully developed
could be a direct result of the Kulture we live in. This is an
argument for a different time. For the time being, I'll stick with
21.]
"The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is the anterior part of the frontal lobes of the brain, lying in front of the motor and premotor areas.
This brain region has been implicated in planning complex cognitive behavior, personality expression, decision making and moderating social behavior.[1] The basic activity of this brain region is considered to be orchestration of thoughts and actions in accordance with internal goals.[2]
The most typical psychological term for functions carried out by the prefrontal cortex area is executive function. Executive function relates to abilities to differentiate among conflicting thoughts, determine good and bad, better and best, same and different, future consequences of current activities, working toward a defined goal, prediction of outcomes, expectation based on actions, and social "control" (the ability to suppress urges that, if not suppressed, could lead to socially unacceptable outcomes).
Many authors have indicated an integral link between a person's personality and the functions of the prefrontal cortex."
Source: Wikipedia
"Parents need to realize the rational part of a teen's brain isn't fully developed and won't be until he or she is 25 years old or so."
–Jana Martin, Ph.D., psychologist and spokeswoman for the American Psychological Association
"Science is unraveling the biological reasons that teens act like teens. Recent research has found adult and teen brains work differently. Their brains are wired in a way that floods them with emotional responses to external events. Adults think with the prefrontal cortex, the brain's rational part, but teens process information with the amygdala, the emotional part. The amygdala is part of the limbic system of the brain, which is fully functioning and utilized by age 13-14 years. The prefrontal cortex fully develops between the ages of 18-21."
Source: yourteen.org
Just how would
the development of the prefrontal cortex interfere with first
becoming a mother? Look at the functions and results of the fully
developed prefrontal cortex: orchestration of thoughts and actions in
accordance with INTERNAL GOALS, PERSONALITY EXPRESSION, etc. In
other words, a person is a more complete, defined INDIVIDUAL after
the PFC is fully developed. So, after 21, we have an complete
individual, whole unto herself, with goals and set personality. Once
an individual is defined, most often in this Kulture in regard to
lifestyle, employment, and social life, everything is SELF-oriented.
The farther one gets from 21, the MORE DEFINED the individual
becomes, set in her ways as being whole unto herself. The child
introduced after this becomes, perhaps, an OBJECT outside herself to
which she must adjust.
Juxtapose this
Individual with the teenage brain which is highly emotional, who
still internalizes external events, who is not set in personality or
SELF, but open to being part of a greater whole. With the
introduction of a child (and probably a man), which brain would be
better suited to BOND with another for the first time? Motherhood,
children, and possibly husband would ALL then become part of the
WHOLE person she becomes when the PFC does develop. Her goals would
then include FAMILY and Motherhood would be PART of her personality.
The child introduced during this time becomes a PART of her.
I'm not saying
that there aren't good Mothers who had their first children after 21.
My wife is an example of one. What I am saying is that it is much
more of a STRUGGLE to be a good Mother if the first child is born
after 21, when it is much easier – if the culture is in line with
Nature – if the first child is born between the ages of 13 and 21,
17 being the mean optimal age for first pregnancy.
Whoa!
... SLOW DOWN!
I can hear the gears turning – what kind of twisted pedophile
claims that 13 and 14 year-olds should be having children? Uhg!
Children having children! (All Kultural meme responses) Not MY
little girl!
What you have to
understand is the importance of the Fibonacci Means and Bell Curve
distribution. If you look at [Fig. 1], you will see the distribution
around the F-Mean of 17 is 68%, meaning over two-thirds of the first
pregnancies we are theorizing would be between the ages of 16 and 18,
with a corresponding 14% between 18-19. A full 84% would occur at 16
and above, and 95% between the ages of 15 and 19.
[Fig. 1]
Source:
psychology.wikia.com
This is a
perfect fit for the 13-21 Fibonacci cycle. If you put 17 years at 0,
+1 becomes 18, and so on to +4 at 21. -1 is 16, -4 is 13, and ages
in between fall on distribution points.
Even so, a the
typical response from the typical person raised in this Kulture would
believe that even this distribution is far too young for women to
enter into Motherhood. This is most certainly due to mal-adapted
gender roles created by the Artificial world of Industry imposed upon
the populace, and it all starts in school.
Education
The entire Educational System is based
on it the Phi Ratio as expressed in Fibonacci whole numbers. This is
not a coincidence, and as you will see, forces the majority into
lop-sided pair bonding relationship patterns that directly conflict
with Nature.
At (5*) our children are sent to institutionalized education. Kindergarten through 2nd grade are
designed as a colorful, playful introduction to school. In 3rd grade (8*) things change and become more serious ... you will find some of the bitchiest teachers in any school at the 3rd grade level, which begins a more rigorous academic agenda. 3rd-5th and 6th-8th are divided at the mean, with 6th-8th grades approaching a more “secondary school” atmosphere, changing classes and teachers more often. These steps are built into the pedagogy. By the end of 8th grade, most students have turned 14, and thus ends/begins another FC 13 – 21.
Traditionally, most formal education ended at the completion of 8th grade (that is why High School is often still referred to as “secondary school"). Most women did not attend after 8th grade. Usually, affluent boys attended secondary school, with the other boys taking apprenticeships, laboring on family farms, or generally finding their ways in the world. Secondary school (High School) ends with graduation at a Fibonacci Mean age of 17/18. Some of the wealthy or very intelligent went on to college, which ends upon graduation at another Fibonacci age of (*21).
Now, as a matter of course, ALL young people enter High School, and MOST go to some form of college. Boys and girls, rich and poor. The relevance of this is that during this CRUCIAL developmental phase (13-21), males and females are pushed together in a sociological quagmire. At a time when the young woman's biological instinct is to look for a mate and start a family, she is force-fed a diet of boys who are critically incapable of fulfilling the role of Patriarch.
Phi-losophical Differences
As you can see,
the Phi Ratio, or, Golden Mean, appears to be ubiquitous in human
development. I'm certainly not the first person to recognize this,
as it would appear that even the educational pedagogy follows this
paradigm.
The only
question is: how is this fact used or abused by Kulture to affect our
experience of life?
Part 3 will delve into the Male role in
reproduction and adverse effects of the similar-age pair-bonding in
long-term relationships for both Males and Females.
3.3.13
No comments:
Post a Comment