Part 1 will illustrate the specific numbers, patterns, and "means and harmonics" that emerge when a Male/Female pair is offset at a rational point, that point being 21 and 13. This hypothesis suggests that a Female human should begin reproduction during an earlier Fibonacci cycle (13-21) than a Male human (21-34), rather than the current Kultural pair bonding of similar-aged partners. Part 2 will discuss the implications of the hypothesis versus the effects of the unnatural coupling that modern reproductive Kulture produces.
Part 1 -- Means and Harmonics
Graph A
Graph A represents the Fibonacci numbers as they apply to human age "cycles," henceforth referred to as Fibonacci Cycles. The Fibonacci series is as follows: 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89, ... with each number correlating to age and the periods within representing distinct developmental periods in humans, male and female. The top section represents the female age and the bottom represents the male age when the cycles are offset at 13(F) and 21(M). The shaded areas show the cycles in which the hypothesis suggests males and females would begin procreation. The "means" of each cycle are represented as well, being of utmost importance. For example, though 13(F) is the beginning of the cycle (and, not coincidentally, the average age of menarche), 21(F) is the end of the cycle, therefore 17(F) is the "mean," or "average" age of that particular cycle, and these means are of great significance.
*It is important to remember that when dealing with Fibonacci cycles, they are always approximations, just as the Fibonacci series only approximates Phi. For example, 8-13 could be inclusive or exclusive ... is 34 the end of low-risk female fertility, or is 35 the beginning of high risk pregnancy? The periods between cycles are somewhat elastic.
Notes
Notes indicate the significance of Graph A as it relates to points in human development when the male and female is offset at 21 and 13, respectively, and touches on statistics as to why they should be.
Fibonacci Numbers:
8 -- early onset Menarche (first menses or period) is DEFINED as before 8 years old
13 -- the average age of Menarche; average age of growth spurt (14) in boys
21 -- prefrontal cortex fully developed
34 -- after which all pregnancies are considered "high risk"
55 -- the mode (most common age) on the list of oldest "natural" births
Fibonacci Means:
10.5 -- average age of Thelarche (breast development)
17 -- Definition of late onset Mencarche; average age of completion of growth in men
27.5 -- 2nd generation significance (next graph)
44.5 -- Mid 40s is average age of Perimenopause
72 -- average last year of life, male ... average age of death, male (73)
Harmonics:
72(F) intersects 80(M) -- average ages of death, M - 73.2; F - 79.7
72(M) intersects 64(F)
44.5(M) intersects 36.5(F) ... the mean of 64 and 36.5 is 50.25 -- 51 is the avg. age menopause
72(M) intersects 64(F) ... the mean of 64 and 55 is 59.5 -- see below
63(M) intersects 55(F) ... the mean of 63 and 55 is 59 -- the oldest known natural birth
55(M) intersects 47(F) ... the mean of 55 and 47 is 51 -- the average age of Menopause
17(M) intersects 9(F) ... 17+9=26, mean of 17 and 9 is 13 (Fibonacci #)
34(M) intersects 26(F) ... 26/2=13 (Fibonacci #)
The fact that by aligning the female 13 with the male 21 produces all these results is remarkable. But by taking it a step farther, to the 2nd generation, will there be any of these Phi coincidences?
Graph B
Graph B shows a Father who's daughter is born on the Cycle Mean of 27.5. As it clearly shows, at his next Cycle Mean of 44.5, she is at her Cycle Mean of 17. When he reaches the Fibonacci 55, she is at her Cycle Mean of 27.5, and when the Father at the approximate age of death for a male, the Cycle Mean of 72, she is at a cycle mean of 44.5, which is the average age of the onset of Perimenopause. Let's take it to a third generation ...
Graph C
This graph plots 3 generation of women, each daughter born on the Mother's Cycle Mean of 17. We'll call the top Grandma, the middle Mama, and the bottom, Daughter (G,M,D, for short). The first "meeting of the means" is between the Grandma and the mother, at G's 27.5 and M's 10.5. The next has obvious significance, as G is reaching the age of high risk pregnancy, Fibonacci 34, M is at the Cycle Mean of 17, beginning reproduction. When M hits Fibonacci 34, the same instance occurs for D, 17; however, at the same time, G is at 51, the average age of Menopause! D hits 21 precisely at G's Fibonacci 55, and later, when M hits 55, G is at 72. Again, 55 is the "mode" on the list of oldest known "natural" childbirths, and 72 is the average age of a male's death.
In Girls, Thelarche (8-13, avg. 10.5), Pubarche (8.5-13.5, avg. 11), Growth Spurt (10-12.5, avg. 11.23), and Menarche (10.5-14.5 avg. 12.5), all trend toward the 8-13 Fibonacci Cycle, and the conclusion that the average girl is biologically complete to begin reproduction during the 13-21 Fibonacci Cycle.
With Boys Pubarche (10-14, avg. 12), Growth Spurt (11-17, avg. 14), and Completion of Growth (15-20, avg. 17), all trend toward the Fibonacci Cycle of 13-21, making these still developmental years for males.
The hypothesis suggests that males and female cycles diverge in purpose, specifically during the 13-21 cycle.
The evidence in the means and harmonics of the resulting shift in Fibonacci Cycles supports this as being a natural function of human development.
As will be discussed in Part 2, there are natural reasons for this shift between male and female development due to the natural gender roles each must fulfill for the best propagation of the species, despite what the current Kultural paradigm promotes and perpetuates.
2/24/13
