tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28561920093399704522024-03-04T22:13:59.785-08:00KultamericaWhajonahlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16440976955700081568noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2856192009339970452.post-38289838972661767982014-08-13T00:20:00.001-07:002017-07-30T10:57:14.255-07:00False Scarcity and Rewarding Bad Behavior<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">I realized, about a decade into a marriage, that I was inadvertently "Rewarding Bad Behavior." Every time I was treated poorly -- and this was almost daily -- I came to the conclusion that </span><i style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">I just had to treat her better, love her more, be a better "man." </i><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Every time this happened, I was "rewarding bad behavior." </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmES6XM6MsgIN7NW-BMK9Ljz2SRNhiVcCY6GUVMjQgI_9WiYRG8a9GLhxg9nzoEPya5VaUlMrgW6byqOEMzrX4IbsjUS8Pbmei5f3MCjC7SOpKEniWYpXqpBp7PkOE3zHXvq3ncA9RdcI/s1600/pushing.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjmES6XM6MsgIN7NW-BMK9Ljz2SRNhiVcCY6GUVMjQgI_9WiYRG8a9GLhxg9nzoEPya5VaUlMrgW6byqOEMzrX4IbsjUS8Pbmei5f3MCjC7SOpKEniWYpXqpBp7PkOE3zHXvq3ncA9RdcI/s1600/pushing.jpg" /></span></a></div>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">I'm not a Behaviorist myself, in that, I don't believe that all behaviors are conditioned. I believe there are environmental, social, and familial factors that contribute to a person's overall personality and actions. However, we are all animals, subject to Pavlovian training, and as men, we often exploit this to our own demise. Kulturally, we are taught that it is our responsibility to provide for, dote on, and generally make the woman happy. If she is not, the WE must be doing something wrong. So what do we do? We </span><i style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">do more, try harder.</i></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><i><br /></i>
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBMMDssBKo1SReAu5GCwJCGZC0KhbU6v_bY0Zudw84hTYb0ywdIYmY6fjwzVfUoNOhNp3UwWkwgH-MgfwAbJUVe5MWN4s3nfQyEl_X9KaLwWEAYtP5aLH0ASLw9LgHvBFUnuLh9BG3q4Y/s1600/flowers.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBMMDssBKo1SReAu5GCwJCGZC0KhbU6v_bY0Zudw84hTYb0ywdIYmY6fjwzVfUoNOhNp3UwWkwgH-MgfwAbJUVe5MWN4s3nfQyEl_X9KaLwWEAYtP5aLH0ASLw9LgHvBFUnuLh9BG3q4Y/s1600/flowers.jpg" /></span></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">What occurs is a Pavlovian cycle of diminishing returns. She refuses our advances: we buy her flowers. She says we don't earn enough: we work harder. She insults us: we attempt to improve. Do you get it now? Every time she is a complete jerk to us, we treat her BETTER! It is only animal instinct that she will continue ... no, </span><i style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">increase</i><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> her poor actions because every time she does, she gets a positive response. </span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7hvHusvCklRmwelNNFYMreR-Q4zJUBNnG-uiX82iqLWjtwXTJE38GgCwTWVHkN_OvL-ZNm5ptsYAj3oOOcrdeeFOUyga2GOQLULpgdW-Sb4ovsTLmjwgg0XzL1LPjI0YLsbBI47RPDvA/s1600/pavlovs_dog.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><img border="0" height="256" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7hvHusvCklRmwelNNFYMreR-Q4zJUBNnG-uiX82iqLWjtwXTJE38GgCwTWVHkN_OvL-ZNm5ptsYAj3oOOcrdeeFOUyga2GOQLULpgdW-Sb4ovsTLmjwgg0XzL1LPjI0YLsbBI47RPDvA/s1600/pavlovs_dog.jpg" width="320" /></span></a></div>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white; font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">This is not to say that WE are to blame -- we are not. After all, we are just doing what seems to be the right thing to do. Unfortunately, we continue to reward bad behavior until they have absolutely no respect at all for us as men.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Why do we do this? </span><i style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">False Scarcity</i><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">, an economic term. Kulturally, we have been trained that women -- at least available women to copulate with -- are scarce. We have been taught that women don't desire sex as much as men. We have been taught that women are a prized possession when no person is a "possession." The idea of "false scarcity" is most easily seen with the example of diamonds: if diamonds are so rare to be highly priced, how come so many women are walking around with them on their fingers? Ever seen a jewelry shop say, "Oh, I'm sorry ... we're plum out of diamonds." Of course you haven't. It's a false scarcity that increases the price you have to pay.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNjtXSaFpZwHAlFzCNOlcoUUGHxPavEM_YXMUgdghZfJ-_EgRSer87HDyA6K7TqaoUmLiHpGhaxDTApI7HyAeFTpdsJTWaRmeYMUKVlIuJtM9CDx1rymQZoVK_cS4eAwkFL1urYdoezM4/s1600/scarcity.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNjtXSaFpZwHAlFzCNOlcoUUGHxPavEM_YXMUgdghZfJ-_EgRSer87HDyA6K7TqaoUmLiHpGhaxDTApI7HyAeFTpdsJTWaRmeYMUKVlIuJtM9CDx1rymQZoVK_cS4eAwkFL1urYdoezM4/s1600/scarcity.png" width="320" /></span></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: black; color: white; font-size: xx-small;">Find some water, man.</span></span></div>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white; font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Well, we run into the same thing with (and forgive my crudeness) pussy. It's HARD to get laid (no pun intended). Women, kulture, have created a scarcity of the commodity we seek the most -- that which should not be a commodity at all, but a natural, loving moment between a man and a woman. And when we feel we have "secured" our supply of this limited resource, we will do almost anything to keep it. Unfortunately, the more we do often leads to the situation I described previously -- a downward spiral of rewarding bad behavior ...</span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjklWgtf0GjNAVc2dx6kSDKs7etupsNVML2hpnoyBJQH7VDfdsqLMqHbtCMeUP2Ife0D7W0mchlMHcHGMjy4N-G1fj98KE9ziRW8gbCQsyWrjnV7HrPGNIrc_Jw_d27afGl8gBMzTgHzO8/s1600/fly.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><img border="0" height="154" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjklWgtf0GjNAVc2dx6kSDKs7etupsNVML2hpnoyBJQH7VDfdsqLMqHbtCMeUP2Ife0D7W0mchlMHcHGMjy4N-G1fj98KE9ziRW8gbCQsyWrjnV7HrPGNIrc_Jw_d27afGl8gBMzTgHzO8/s1600/fly.jpg" width="320" /></span></a></div>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">And why do we continue? Well, it leads back to scarcity. We know, inherently, that if </span><i style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">we</i><span style="font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> don't treat our woman well, some other weasel will come along and do it for her, because he is under the spell of false scarcity as well (not excusing his behavior). We know if we don't, someone else will; she knows if we don't, someone else will. Talk about FUCKED.</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhma02e6BTlUcG7EB5nCtlglq9K0PjtYHf9W3LBEWOCoDUI4mphmFDNGoDIXD5VMjT0IBX6TE8QlezCiERETW6bmmsR89VbuXVA8R-wzcwTNfS5jw_FP3n1wASmVqtJfVT2XV3y_nfOKQ8/s1600/bitch.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><img border="0" height="219" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhma02e6BTlUcG7EB5nCtlglq9K0PjtYHf9W3LBEWOCoDUI4mphmFDNGoDIXD5VMjT0IBX6TE8QlezCiERETW6bmmsR89VbuXVA8R-wzcwTNfS5jw_FP3n1wASmVqtJfVT2XV3y_nfOKQ8/s1600/bitch.jpg" width="320" /></span></a></div>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white;"><br style="-webkit-box-shadow: none !important; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: black; color: white; font-family: "verdana" , "arial" , "tahoma" , "calibri" , "geneva" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">So the spiral goes: Either reward bad behavior or suffer the consequences of false scarcity ... if you don't do it, someone else will. Although slightly over half the population are women, women perpetuate the notion that WE should have to struggle to get our basic needs as male human beings met. Until this basic cultural issue is corrected, the cycle will continue. </span>Whajonahlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16440976955700081568noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2856192009339970452.post-61963888190197370772013-07-02T14:38:00.000-07:002013-07-02T14:42:02.582-07:00Deadspeak<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 20pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6cGpl4OkvTQV66TE1aYPnXNvWe6ohI0MAN2qGZ6dS9BSOmRv6pNw8BhAUEl8ogxNoEAb2ZOJ8Vpj1FnTk_MaPcVlbsCndgUmN05Op2gOlAXPOivlvdo-91nueCGyf6QwRIzmVbnDiELQ/s800/mind-body-connection+(1).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6cGpl4OkvTQV66TE1aYPnXNvWe6ohI0MAN2qGZ6dS9BSOmRv6pNw8BhAUEl8ogxNoEAb2ZOJ8Vpj1FnTk_MaPcVlbsCndgUmN05Op2gOlAXPOivlvdo-91nueCGyf6QwRIzmVbnDiELQ/s800/mind-body-connection+(1).jpg" height="225" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: 20pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: 20pt;">W</span>e
are limitless beings continually limited by environmental
distractions. Our “souls” are pure consciousness, purely divine.
The fear of contact with this aspect of ourselves, and others, is
intentionally, rapaciously thrust upon us from the time we are very
young. This is materialism in all forms. The material
world, in itself, is not “evil.” It would not exist only to be
so. However, it can be used as a shield between us and our true
natures. This is the unfortunate reality.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Like a toy, the
material is there to be manipulated for our experience: For home runs
and touchdowns; For the creation of new Life; For enjoyment. These
are the “forms” of the material, human “being” experience.
But we are all, underneath, human <i>becomings</i>,
constantly changing and evolving from this material experience and
its outcomes.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
FORM = FOR (M)aterial experience</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFDIz9M4QXeASNOra0xWEcLsi2mRuwjb1PaFVw03cgnkrRcNDdPoBl_BNxxdPMhixmusPA7Qas6ciKzqpHv9HFej-SFR3cgbOpVy4JD6VR08UYXezoMheRBdrGPz3p1jBFpUIXMv3F_WM/s387/ce01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFDIz9M4QXeASNOra0xWEcLsi2mRuwjb1PaFVw03cgnkrRcNDdPoBl_BNxxdPMhixmusPA7Qas6ciKzqpHv9HFej-SFR3cgbOpVy4JD6VR08UYXezoMheRBdrGPz3p1jBFpUIXMv3F_WM/s387/ce01.jpg" height="146" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Our consciousness has no material <i>stuff</i>. Some would argue
that consciousness consists wholly and entirely of and within the
brain. It has been my experience that this is not entirely so, and I
would propose that the brain is merely a conduit, a container within
which the immaterial expresses itself outwardly in the material,
3-dimensional world. While the brain anchors consciousness in
3-dimensions, consciousness remains interwoven with the fabric of a
greater existence that we can't wholly integrate.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIBVznWpWQADsN8qrQW0F3Ya2xRjmPW4f6tWIf4vKdmIidMyZ1bchLUbYTt_LYal5_eihE_aptJ7RPtQaXY3a_wzFnuur_znemSjrG9iDVrRWV5rqhbME2TuWweRMFRyg0iFZqgds47aA/s347/Ben-Ahrens-MindBody2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIBVznWpWQADsN8qrQW0F3Ya2xRjmPW4f6tWIf4vKdmIidMyZ1bchLUbYTt_LYal5_eihE_aptJ7RPtQaXY3a_wzFnuur_znemSjrG9iDVrRWV5rqhbME2TuWweRMFRyg0iFZqgds47aA/s347/Ben-Ahrens-MindBody2.jpg" height="199" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
With this partial understanding, we can extrapolate that while the
body surely will die, the consciousness part of our existence might
not. In fact, the very reason we might have bodies is so the
entity that is our consciousness can experience and grow in a
3-dimensional plane, with nearness and distance, touch and feeling,
sights and sounds, birth and death and all the dynamics involved.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Of course, some sort of “afterlife” is not a <i>secret</i> that
the Kulture tries to keep, however hardily it might attempt to confuse.
Religions such as Christianity and Islam rely heavily on the idea of
some ethereal survival after the death of the body. Some, Buddhism
and Hinduism in particular, have varying ideas regarding reaching
this state of existence <i>before </i>death, through ritual,
meditation, abstinence, and the like. I have come to believe that
the secret our Kulture and other cultures have sought to obfuscate is
how easy it is to connect with our infinite selves and the infinite
selves of others. I don't believe there is a special chant, a secret
handshake, a password, or a set of pain-inflicting tasks one has to
achieve in order to access this other plane. Why should it be so
difficult? After all, it is within us.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJLIqRkpBmPnIohxJl_N_1XdSYcEb8YRSF34q7W71CwwD9I8mAkuamIti9QNDkrBq5vdmjiCn-k8sPL-pIZS46EXu429NjpOH26zsvcp2cixTTyYqpfui9iY9nhcgWIk0ax2dgMRtA-Yc/s638/TibetMonks4TWTC_Knighterrant_s640x426.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJLIqRkpBmPnIohxJl_N_1XdSYcEb8YRSF34q7W71CwwD9I8mAkuamIti9QNDkrBq5vdmjiCn-k8sPL-pIZS46EXu429NjpOH26zsvcp2cixTTyYqpfui9iY9nhcgWIk0ax2dgMRtA-Yc/s638/TibetMonks4TWTC_Knighterrant_s640x426.jpg" height="213" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Okay, now for the hokey part. I have never been an extremely
religious or new-agey person, I don't believe in ghosts, and for the
most part, I'm fairly down to Earth and analytical. However, I do
believe I have communicated with the “consciousness” of someone
who was close to me and now is dead (body), and also believe I
occasionally communicate with another “person,” the nature of whose
consciousness I'm not going to get into right now (entirely human, don't think I'm all evil-spirited up).</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn7wpzg132Xtx7sUbW-cyN6QZ3-b4VqpfIoiB2VpodLzqTZmxnlTlIIlMg3qu3I8K4hlnhBDG1wqzT8yABIhxIFB67Max7iBazEWAecrdeEFycqwfqYWSfjZhjSAu6YfUCcoGtT70pm2M/s259/images+(2).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn7wpzg132Xtx7sUbW-cyN6QZ3-b4VqpfIoiB2VpodLzqTZmxnlTlIIlMg3qu3I8K4hlnhBDG1wqzT8yABIhxIFB67Max7iBazEWAecrdeEFycqwfqYWSfjZhjSAu6YfUCcoGtT70pm2M/s259/images+(2).jpg" height="200" width="149" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Yep … get the meds and call the R-wing, he's ready for transport
to the rubber room!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4kQ7ItYyTffvMpqHa6rKZuKnvCzvwQLx9FsVYM8xHFSgtAwpL9RccrCIcKguDREdOae34Y0rKIDh1OLNtXzq9ClNm9d3voZ3RxqgZyCCzpdD7C9DIFIGV9BbQ_YAIf-3mzfVC6OheHOE/s288/4618600-crazy-woman-wearing-a-metal-colander-for-a-helmet.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4kQ7ItYyTffvMpqHa6rKZuKnvCzvwQLx9FsVYM8xHFSgtAwpL9RccrCIcKguDREdOae34Y0rKIDh1OLNtXzq9ClNm9d3voZ3RxqgZyCCzpdD7C9DIFIGV9BbQ_YAIf-3mzfVC6OheHOE/s288/4618600-crazy-woman-wearing-a-metal-colander-for-a-helmet.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Except, not really. When the world's largest religion believes that
bread and wine are literally turned into 2000 year old flesh and
blood, when another promises 72 virgins as a result of martyrdom,
when yet another believes that darker skin means more sin in a
previous life, the idea of consciousness transcending locality and
the death of the body isn't too extreme. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: left;">
Now, I don't mean to prove
that my own idiosyncrasy is true just by the fact that others are
more outlandish; to the contrary, I don't mean to “prove” this
belief at all. I mean, I'M not even convinced. But let's just
suppose …</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
IF consciousness is non-local, AND it survives the death of the
body, THEN the likelihood of inter-dimensional communication is not
only possible, it is highly probable. As I stated before, I believe
that I have experienced this very phenomenon and there aren't any
bells and whistles.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrC9g8U65dU2zqPizMZ6NXlr6eyPrEaL_mvPKL8N6KT_UxJoEv60PDggJjQBwE_xQaohZU65rRemlPuvoYXSLYM-cr6-a0Uu5zr2JWjX5anz5mMe3GvdsEDvvbmuXjpuCWg-DkEFohw7o/s500/mind-body-connection.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrC9g8U65dU2zqPizMZ6NXlr6eyPrEaL_mvPKL8N6KT_UxJoEv60PDggJjQBwE_xQaohZU65rRemlPuvoYXSLYM-cr6-a0Uu5zr2JWjX5anz5mMe3GvdsEDvvbmuXjpuCWg-DkEFohw7o/s500/mind-body-connection.jpg" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I wrote the lion's share of this essay directly after one such
“conversation” with, actually, <i>both </i>of the two
consciousnesses I previously mentioned. Parts of it I felt as if we
were writing together. Almost entirely *lost in thought and
well-focused, I didn't find the rift between life and death difficult
to maneuver. Maybe, after all, THIS is the secret that all the
Kultural fiddle-faddle seeks to hide: </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
It is as easy to communicate with those who have been close to us in
the material world and have died as it is to communicate with those
who are still present in body. In fact, it is much easier.
Terrestrial communication is limited by many barriers: time,
location, focus, consciousness barriers, language (including the
obvious language barriers, but as well, body language, differences in
vocabulary, nuances in meaning of words – a single word can have
different “experiential connotations” attached to it depending
upon the person uttering it or the person listening, etc.), semantics, health,
age, culture, and others.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsvrKMNg3FBoRctW-c1ermCG4X3m0lrxm3y6yzRFoIgTLDFVynrxacxiTO0xQkJ2spbKttFdxnKKC4nKiI8O3EKWT7zKDOQfKfRalwPU7Yp_A2vgzu25MQ925qiuSnG57EHtWZNDZiE90/s261/images+(3).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsvrKMNg3FBoRctW-c1ermCG4X3m0lrxm3y6yzRFoIgTLDFVynrxacxiTO0xQkJ2spbKttFdxnKKC4nKiI8O3EKWT7zKDOQfKfRalwPU7Yp_A2vgzu25MQ925qiuSnG57EHtWZNDZiE90/s261/images+(3).jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">"This is not a pipe."</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Telepathic
communication (and I'm not even sure telepathic is the correct word because that involves distance) is limited only by focus. <i>Cogito ergo sum</i>.
There are a few other, perhaps <i>geometric</i>
barriers I don't quite understand and it has only explained to me but
in visual representation. It appears as a kind of rounded, opaque,
grey corner, rotating toward me with mathematical symbols and lines
of demarcation, as if it were time itself unfurling in my direction
(that is my interpretation, anyway). Those who are free of the
material, can “see” around these corners, like shadows lurking in
the direction of the light. “Pre-shadows,” if you will.
Initially, I would assume that these barriers would only limit our
communication <i>from</i> them, but oddly enough, it seems to be the other
way around. Perhaps this is for “their” protection (i.e., would
a dead parent want to experience his child having sexual relations,
or committing a crime?). That appears to be the only barrier None
of the Hollywood contrivances like seances our talismans are
necessary. These ideas are simply more barriers that are put between
us and our true nature.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
That
is not to say a piece of the material world might hold a “piece”
of former consciousness within it, or help one to focus, at the very
least. An illustration of this (pun stumbled upon) would be an
experience I had in the Vincent Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam. While
gazing upon a Van Gogh self portrait, I experienced a literal
“thought conversation” with the man. It was as if he had left a
piece of himself in that painting with a message and the painting
itself acted as a doorway to this communication. Tortured soul that
he was, it would only seem logical that he would leave pieces of his
soul within his works. It's possible that sigils such as great works
of art, which are, in essence, <i>gifts</i>
(in this case, gifts to the world), help to eliminate the
aforementioned thin geometric barrier.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1A2QRlOIzC9N7dCJ5Tf_6EaseATHsbHk91QX6cqZBFBsOtIPtMwYZC6ZFMLmr4lldiutPX2I1Drj1SyRiF1Orb3ePUbf6ffKCI5oJPsfTxrGDXaE4uZa3SqeQI_gqLte2Ip3mHSPuUG8/s245/images+(4).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1A2QRlOIzC9N7dCJ5Tf_6EaseATHsbHk91QX6cqZBFBsOtIPtMwYZC6ZFMLmr4lldiutPX2I1Drj1SyRiF1Orb3ePUbf6ffKCI5oJPsfTxrGDXaE4uZa3SqeQI_gqLte2Ip3mHSPuUG8/s245/images+(4).jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Our
Kulture seeks to further the limits of our true nature consciousness
regarding the transcendence of the material. You have the obvious –
the decadent descent into all things superficial. Most people are
lost on this 1<sup>st</sup>
level material plane, hindered by financial hardships or greed,
desirous to be fashionable and keep up with all the Joneses, blinded
by technological advances, obsessed with appearance and all things
shiny and visual, seduced by science that tells us such things are
impossible, stupefied by the school system, and/or hypnotized by the
media.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfHXxOf5ydcZzFd57sK2I11ouGhY_iK4EtfO-zZRHqJf28WAN3Q6lsPfaMIM-fhM_rgOzxYlhTiKgzUH9wMOj3PGoaBb1CoDVtQpe9wSy3zADkABI_52ZcTPNyO8lQLZzmR5kSqB1YmWk/s600/material.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfHXxOf5ydcZzFd57sK2I11ouGhY_iK4EtfO-zZRHqJf28WAN3Q6lsPfaMIM-fhM_rgOzxYlhTiKgzUH9wMOj3PGoaBb1CoDVtQpe9wSy3zADkABI_52ZcTPNyO8lQLZzmR5kSqB1YmWk/s600/material.jpg" height="236" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
But there are other, less obvious barriers our Kulture places
between us and ourselves. One is the implication of the necessity of
“evil” in the transcendent. How many men in black robes does it
take to chant mystically in a circle around a sacrificial virgin to
communicate with the dead? ZERO. However, this idea becomes
implicit when we read, watch television or movies, or even go to
church. It is implied that something BAD must happen, that there
must be an evil mojo present, or at the very least, an ordained
minister's blessing to conjure such a notion as the transcendental
nature of human consciousness.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhO9lMv1ImHyLLZjrGXvOTiPo4eIJY4Z6Vjj_J24yXp7VYbBfOqY_VAKo9Neh9xICXz3vJbrSnVCZexERscZmulHzO9amA_dpegIV7_vpilaHaVIOAX8S_TuIEebv2DneqMmqVA6XG7v38/s450/cult.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhO9lMv1ImHyLLZjrGXvOTiPo4eIJY4Z6Vjj_J24yXp7VYbBfOqY_VAKo9Neh9xICXz3vJbrSnVCZexERscZmulHzO9amA_dpegIV7_vpilaHaVIOAX8S_TuIEebv2DneqMmqVA6XG7v38/s450/cult.jpg" height="160" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
We
actually know VERY LITTLE about our own human consciousness
experience or even the very essence of the universe, but these wise
men and women are certain to tell you exactly how NOT to do it.
They've let us know that we must be dabbling with the <i>dark</i>
if we consider anything but the material … unless, of course, it is
a practice labeled and approved by a major religion.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
From my experience, the transcendental nature of reality ebbs and
flows through the material world as sure as all those little Wi-Fi
waves are zipping and fluttering through your bones this minute. Let
me give you an example:
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Imagine
a perfect square and assign a unit of 1 as length of each side.
Mentally, draw a line from one corner of the square to its opposite,
making two right triangles. Now, give me a measurement in units of
the line you just created. The fact is, you cannot. The measurement
of that line is <span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">√</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">2,
which is an irrational number – it is a number that continues
infinitely without repeating 1.414213562 … and on and on and on …
So, a basic shape that you learned to identify when you were 1 ½
years old, about the simplest shape there is, one which appears
bounded on all sides, and in every way extremely simple, actually
contains the infinite.</span> <span style="font-family: 'Liberation Serif', serif;">Nevertheless, we can use a
square to build a block, and this block can be played with by a
child, or it can be used to build a pyramid. All the while being at
once completely tangible while containing the completely intangible.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Liberation Serif', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdbhSuTFD4wLmJ6mL-vxQuzIoWUmPIVXvegJrhgKHyChaGuXW5MLX1VBWOfGKJffmmh5HTx9mg_a-Q44c0_m6UaN6NMqlS6vyk1fgZ24DXgb81FXyfQ8aJoV3_cKwEEDR6CEpDS1kkpbU/s387/unit-square-with-diagonal.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhdbhSuTFD4wLmJ6mL-vxQuzIoWUmPIVXvegJrhgKHyChaGuXW5MLX1VBWOfGKJffmmh5HTx9mg_a-Q44c0_m6UaN6NMqlS6vyk1fgZ24DXgb81FXyfQ8aJoV3_cKwEEDR6CEpDS1kkpbU/s387/unit-square-with-diagonal.JPG" height="200" width="198" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: 'Liberation Serif', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"> Now,
of course there will be those who will answer: </span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><i>You
can't draw a perfect square</i></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">.
To whom I will answer: </span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><i>You
can't draw an IMPERFECT</i></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><i>square.</i></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
By definition, a square, the concept – square – is perfect. By
definition you can't draw a square, period, because we live in a
3-dimensional world. A square is 2-dimensional. Even the dust from
the pencil makes this impossible. </span><span style="font-family: 'Liberation Serif', serif;">Regardless, this conceptual
square exists, and we use it to lay foundations, build walls, and
guide ships. And within this very solidly bounded shape exists the
UN-bounded!</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"> From
our tangible experience, we humans begin with a body. Kulturally, it
<i>must</i> be clothed. Then, they must be the </span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><i>right</i></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
clothes, the fashionable clothes. Then, by kulture, you've got to
have the right accessories. Next, you put this Kulturally clothed
person in a box, a house or apartment, somewhere away from the
elements. Send this person to a school box to conditionally
associate all the Kulturally acceptable from unacceptable. Give this
person a Je-ob (or, Job, Biblically, tortured while worshiping the
torturer over a bet, as similar to industrial employment as any
metaphor I could conjure), and put the person in a boxy vehicle to get
himself from one box to the other. Feed it a daily dose of fear from
boxes of cereal, program it from boxes that flash little digital
pictures and audio into its brain … is it any wonder why the
original, naked being while becoming loses its connection to the limitless? </span><span style="font-family: 'Liberation Serif', serif;">Is n't a person in our Kulture analogous to the diagonal of a square?</span><span style="font-family: 'Liberation Serif', serif;"> Even
if you begin to think “outside the box” it is labeled “radical”
thinking.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: 'Liberation Serif', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2rMDv9KGEUbPMhc6D03NnjS0Z0qbWce0_fGorDOhyOKJfT9mmS62fWIei47tdXQpvXyKcGgtSYyYRVJf7k5mHng867u3WsyPwX1N8Jdjdae_fQEDObyJmpr61TQ_cl3LpMJ-WaFBprBU/s1386/Screenshot-2335.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2rMDv9KGEUbPMhc6D03NnjS0Z0qbWce0_fGorDOhyOKJfT9mmS62fWIei47tdXQpvXyKcGgtSYyYRVJf7k5mHng867u3WsyPwX1N8Jdjdae_fQEDObyJmpr61TQ_cl3LpMJ-WaFBprBU/s1386/Screenshot-2335.jpg" height="277" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: 'Liberation Serif', serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Our naked body is the 3-dimensional boundary of the infinite,
limitless consciousness contained within. If this were the only
boundary, without all the Kultural distractions, we might soon discover that the connection to the eternal,
the divine, or the “perfect” is not so difficult as we are led to
believe. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfOb2wrxFX2VudsEcMGQzzfn6kq-EE6WoqYwFA9e8YoWy92OWH07Qv1X3SNkkRWcPa3CWfFIIDOqjMVU-rgq9uYmE8lKXqxLQbpbSDv1XzUItlhXF34PJc9mMvw60Mv4RNcYfTkBs4vHU/s400/Baby-girl-lost-in-thoughtsdf.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfOb2wrxFX2VudsEcMGQzzfn6kq-EE6WoqYwFA9e8YoWy92OWH07Qv1X3SNkkRWcPa3CWfFIIDOqjMVU-rgq9uYmE8lKXqxLQbpbSDv1XzUItlhXF34PJc9mMvw60Mv4RNcYfTkBs4vHU/s400/Baby-girl-lost-in-thoughtsdf.jpg" height="264" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
*lost -- isn't it odd that when someone is extremely focused and concetrating, we call him "lost" in thought? Is the pejorative "lost" an attempt to keep the minds eye on the material?</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
~ Whajonahle 7.2.2013</div>
Whajonahlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16440976955700081568noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2856192009339970452.post-72905579887659572852013-03-20T22:07:00.001-07:002013-11-10T23:46:58.235-08:00Phi Ratio and Human Reproduction -- Part 3<div class="western">
<u>Fibonacci Ages of Human Life</u><br />
<br />
0-1 Conception to birth<br />
1-1 Learn to walk<br />
1-2 Learn to talk<br />
2-3 By 3 have learned more than will learn rest of life<br />
3-5 Personality develops<br />
5-8 Reason develops<br />
8-13 Genders diverge, Social roles and status realized<br />
13-21 Female: Attract Best Mate, Nesting, Family, Motherhood begins, Marriage<br />
13-21 Male: Avocational, Vocational foundation<br />
21-34 Female: Mother, Educator, Most influential period<br />
21-34 Male: Professional Achievement, Attract Best Mate, Marriage, Fatherhood<br />
34-55 Female: Provides Wisdom to 2nd Generation, Wisdom to Community<br />
34-55 Male: From Prince to King<br />
55-89 Female: Elder Stateswoman<br />
55-89 Male: Elder Statesman (though, sperm still viable if extremely successful)<br />
<br />
*I'm having a tough time finding the time to finalize part 3. So I've decided to post an excerpt for an idea of where it's going.</div>
<h2 class="western">
Part 3 – First Fruits, Shattered Flowers, and
Broken Egos</h2>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgx_jYghLG5EbaXErmGskhniCUGwbJfzIPSgWCBI5zFP0zG26xTsQ_3iSbQ5Q0ceyAq03LP7Srzr6ANaSvkIC6gtzOMasEo8SDzF0YjFpyWSRnlqmFnh0qsnAbPJ-X1_uPPq80Rm_LHpag/s1600/niasvb79vvmehhnrucf4uvef57514a94e7410a9.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgx_jYghLG5EbaXErmGskhniCUGwbJfzIPSgWCBI5zFP0zG26xTsQ_3iSbQ5Q0ceyAq03LP7Srzr6ANaSvkIC6gtzOMasEo8SDzF0YjFpyWSRnlqmFnh0qsnAbPJ-X1_uPPq80Rm_LHpag/s1600/niasvb79vvmehhnrucf4uvef57514a94e7410a9.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
Why shouldn't a Man at his most productive get the ripest berry?
Conversely, why should the pip-squeak teenager, who's done nothing
but crack wise in history class reap the finest crop?<br />
<br />
On the female side, why, when a woman is at her most desirable,
her finest hour, have to waste her time with the whiny little
bench-warmers in the game of life? For her own sake, should she not
be in the game of attracting the finest mate for her and her
children's future when at her most competitive? Why should the best
she have to offer a potential husband is whatever is left after years
of bouncing from fraternity boy to grease monkey?<br />
<br />
That's quite a wedding night for both, I'm sure.<br />
<br />
In the long run, why shouldn't a woman have as many good, healthy,
attractive, reproductive years with her husband, instead of a short
window before her husband's attraction begins to wan along with her
child-bearing capacity? Why should she wait until the doors of
opportunity are closing to find stability in a man and family?<br />
<br />
In the long run, why should a man marry a woman whose best years
are behind her, only to find that soon after marriage, she looks more
like his mother than a mate?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Could there be a correlation between the continually escalating
divorce rates, broken families, domestic abuse, incest, drug and
alcohol abuse, depression, suicide rate, adultery, pornography,
homosensuality, poverty, laziness, welfare cases, and many other ills
of society and the un-natural mate pairing of Kultamerica?Whajonahlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16440976955700081568noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2856192009339970452.post-30026407126317248672013-03-03T02:18:00.001-08:002013-05-26T08:51:55.301-07:00Phi Ratio and Human Reproduction -- Part 2<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJuG6fT7I9BdtG48gsd_7IxcMDFaOVdzc7tloVHjUD08-hg8BNc898YB8hB3hsibqCSwXKlCoKKltkjgpnXW4mGGNPz-puiiaSu4ICcvaBUweMDWVbcaWrxIbPn1HxU8LQnsK0MTXg7pg/s1600/phi.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJuG6fT7I9BdtG48gsd_7IxcMDFaOVdzc7tloVHjUD08-hg8BNc898YB8hB3hsibqCSwXKlCoKKltkjgpnXW4mGGNPz-puiiaSu4ICcvaBUweMDWVbcaWrxIbPn1HxU8LQnsK0MTXg7pg/s1600/phi.JPG" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<h3>
</h3>
</div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">
Part 2 –
Little Red Motherhood and the Teenage Wolf</h2>
My 13½ year-old
son recently had his first real "girlfriend." It lasted
about 2 weeks, until she decided she liked his best friend more. His
best friend, a 15 year-old, was currently her best friend's
boyfriend. So it goes in adolescent relationships today. When this
was going on, my wife made a simple but profound statement: <i>It
must be a really difficult age for boys</i><span style="font-style: normal;">.
</span><i>Just what does a 13 year-old boy have to offer a 14
year-old girl</i><span style="font-style: normal;">? It was a
rhetorical question because we both knew the answer – nothing!
Girls of that age are much more mature than boys of the same age, and
generally attracted to the older boys. Sure, they hook up and play
at relationships, but that is only due to convenience. They simply
don't belong together.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2SsWEyVBdkuOoHmSpta1CcaazaBjHh0Z1viviXr1ejIgrZSsRK-oIFjrm4jr2PCW_r5PFgVFQiQ_qDQNmGHlpA-zdddFh-3BKO3koEsBIW_tey6oKTB4bqAN_vJf_xMbtsUdlc97kBuw/s1600/th.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2SsWEyVBdkuOoHmSpta1CcaazaBjHh0Z1viviXr1ejIgrZSsRK-oIFjrm4jr2PCW_r5PFgVFQiQ_qDQNmGHlpA-zdddFh-3BKO3koEsBIW_tey6oKTB4bqAN_vJf_xMbtsUdlc97kBuw/s1600/th.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
*As an update: the particular girl in the story soon worked her way from the
15 year-old "best friend" to a 16 year-old sophomore, then
quickly on to a 17 year-old junior, once they were in "High"
School.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
Now here's a question for you, and if you are completely
indoctrinated in Kultamerica, it's certain that you will not only
have an Orwellian reaction to the mere phrase used, but a Pavlovian
response to my answer, as well. The question is:</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
"Why do teenage girls get pregnant?"</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
The answer is:</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
"BECAUSE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO!"</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
Despite the fact that we've been continually bombarded with over 50
years of insidious propaganda that "teenage pregnancy" is
some sort of horrific PROBLEM, all of humanity owes its existence to
teenage pregnancy. Throughout most of human history people followed
the natural biological patterns and rhythms that exist within our
instincts, and most cultures that developed were in sync with our
biological natures.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFcNdQLfGt4oBDVZQEBzLfTktceQPk5oj2dDBze4WKzlfW537OCqisWLq945K9zlSP5JLQ6Qkc2VmlRSDUgvmi7ZbMH7CuPCr_kLFx1zDjfOIuC7vUTbk56ksfTAmCRFOnv6KMHFMEwRI/s1600/Pregnant_belly_in_black_and_white_and_pink_boots_on_her.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="150" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjFcNdQLfGt4oBDVZQEBzLfTktceQPk5oj2dDBze4WKzlfW537OCqisWLq945K9zlSP5JLQ6Qkc2VmlRSDUgvmi7ZbMH7CuPCr_kLFx1zDjfOIuC7vUTbk56ksfTAmCRFOnv6KMHFMEwRI/s1600/Pregnant_belly_in_black_and_white_and_pink_boots_on_her.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
The fact that we now exist within a Kulture that is antithetical to
our human nature doesn't mitigate the fact that human biology doesn't
evolve just because someone, or a group of people, decides it should.
Industry, feminism, corporatism, eugenics, etc., have coerced the
general population to turn away from the natural order of human
development and reproduction as a matter of Kulture, while our
biological bodies and instincts remain steadfast and true to Nature.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
So what is the REAL problem with teenage females getting pregnant in
Kultamerica (aside from the contrived Kultural mores? THEY ARE
USUALLY IMPREGNATED BY TEENAGE MALES!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfO6ypVbXJd8L59acbqU0avhyphenhyphenioM-9PwGZCsA2tVNs7Pvg632xNXohr3UVXeh_VQ3IBrE1s19HAWi3BxaQe_s3AlR-RFq31UOJq7dimVhKKaNjk4ZgfxOMXFpbxFqzfKZCNSGrIqZop04/s1600/confused-teenage-boy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfO6ypVbXJd8L59acbqU0avhyphenhyphenioM-9PwGZCsA2tVNs7Pvg632xNXohr3UVXeh_VQ3IBrE1s19HAWi3BxaQe_s3AlR-RFq31UOJq7dimVhKKaNjk4ZgfxOMXFpbxFqzfKZCNSGrIqZop04/s1600/confused-teenage-boy.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: xx-small;">"</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">I'm<span style="font-size: xx-small;">, like, gonna<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> be a dad?"</span></span></span></div>
<br />
When the father is not a
teenage male, in this Kulture he is often deemed a "sex
offender." By LAW, we are NOT ALLOWED to procreate as the
biology of the species dictates we should.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<h4>
<u>Hypothesis</u></h4>
<h4>
</h4>
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
The Natural Human Development regarding Reproduction differs in AGE
according to GENDER as expressed in Phi Ratio, Golden Mean, Fibonacci
Whole Number approximations representing age, in years. It expresses
as such in Phi Harmonics when the gender Fibonacci cycles are set to
match at ages 13 Female and 21 Male.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
*See Part 1 – Means and Harmonics for graphs and explanations of
Phi Harmonics with the aforementioned offset.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
What this implies is a socio-economic solution to many of the social
ills of today, merely by following a more Natural Path in regard to
human reproduction and gender roles.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvAoWO66cB7tJz7mWwWIbFZQ0rnzPebXObNJmXvTrsQWCbCqrUaVPgYwMBgD6zvlg5-YQdi6ddvvZ0-3HicLRQGW0A4uuCvFo-S6mTNZ0fonHzxQf5LScpYMc-iT_l76RhKUJtnwcjAfw/s1600/tumblr_m8tl5nCNJ11r0zujto1_500.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvAoWO66cB7tJz7mWwWIbFZQ0rnzPebXObNJmXvTrsQWCbCqrUaVPgYwMBgD6zvlg5-YQdi6ddvvZ0-3HicLRQGW0A4uuCvFo-S6mTNZ0fonHzxQf5LScpYMc-iT_l76RhKUJtnwcjAfw/s1600/tumblr_m8tl5nCNJ11r0zujto1_500.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<u> </u></div>
<h4 style="text-align: left;">
<u>Gender Roles</u></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: left;">
</h4>
The primary role of a woman is Mother.
The primary role of a man is Provider. It is only within the
Industrial Paradigm that a Female can be “provider,” and even
then, without the Male, at quite the cost to society. It must be an
un-natural world in which the Female can be provider. However,our Biologies, our BODIES, come from
the NATURAL world – Kulture has evolved in a direction away from
Nature … to our own misfortune. Even if the biological goal was to
evolve toward Androgyny, culture would evolve at a much faster rate
(however, it is not biology’s goal to evolve toward androgyny;
rather, biology has evolved away from asexual reproduction and become
MORE specialized sexually). Fight biology as much as you want,
Kulturally, but biology and Nature WILL eventually win out.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXUqBSUhX4jqgJIgcEOYpwdbOEqfhKp4jf7qnyWJC0HzEv33WIfTjA9Ux98zm5eh_IGC5zeczUCuenAgcUatluumu6E3Ys2XqFyrWJS6gddaZ8PWzkTUX4TWhHVvZbBKZzpSDNTxbFw-U/s1600/best-picture-gallery-scupture-Eden-Project-Elfleda.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXUqBSUhX4jqgJIgcEOYpwdbOEqfhKp4jf7qnyWJC0HzEv33WIfTjA9Ux98zm5eh_IGC5zeczUCuenAgcUatluumu6E3Ys2XqFyrWJS6gddaZ8PWzkTUX4TWhHVvZbBKZzpSDNTxbFw-U/s1600/best-picture-gallery-scupture-Eden-Project-Elfleda.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Our Kulture has become so removed from
the natural world, that it has become quite easy to assume unnatural
identities, oddities, and ludicrous beliefs (i.e., a <i>third</i>
gender arising, gay "marriage," – propagandist poppycock
to further the downward spiral). Despite the vain attempts of
Kulture to change the natural order of things, Men will remain
stronger, more adept at the physical rigors of survival, and will
never be substitutes for a good Mother. Women will retain their
Maternal instincts – however fiercely the Kulture tries to beat it
out of them – and will remain irreplaceable if we are to survive as
a species.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
As it follows, Men, in order to be good
providers, must have something to offer <i>vis- a-vis</i> provision
and protection. A 27 year-old man, if he is not stuck in the altered
state of protracted adolescence, will ALWAYS be a better mate for a
woman than a 17 year-old boy. Assuming a natural course, the
adolescent male must go out in the world and make something of
himself before he takes a mate. In years past, this was not a
question. A woman of child-bearing age would not give a boy the time
of day, she would only consider a man of means, however meager the
means.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh03k8nEVo8URvNkSnDsXpPgh07hdyjA4y9SoVffOBPadNJAgW0Z-D-kTEIoSf4RLikqdo022k45pXXWKD37Y9qsqhYThE8k-lLAEZG5MLEhRULSbSQap366prnToYp24YOOku3STr8Lsw/s1600/tumblr_lpuvpiFjnG1qhx760o1_500.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh03k8nEVo8URvNkSnDsXpPgh07hdyjA4y9SoVffOBPadNJAgW0Z-D-kTEIoSf4RLikqdo022k45pXXWKD37Y9qsqhYThE8k-lLAEZG5MLEhRULSbSQap366prnToYp24YOOku3STr8Lsw/s1600/tumblr_lpuvpiFjnG1qhx760o1_500.jpg" width="160" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
As it stands today, the standard is a
man of the same age. If this mating occurs when the two are both in
the 13-21 Cycle, the Male is in no way fit to provide and protect,
due partly to the lack of prefrontal cortex development. If this
occurs later, with both in the 21-34 F Cycle, the woman is past the
optimal time for becoming a mother, partly due to the full
development of the prefrontal cortex.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<h4>
</h4>
<h4>
</h4>
<h4>
</h4>
<h4>
<u>The Piano Lesson</u></h4>
<h4>
</h4>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
There are
certain stages of development that certain things are easier, more
natural, to master. A great example of this is learning to play the
piano. It is generally accepted that kids learn to play the piano
easiest if they start around 8 years old, and it becomes
significantly harder after 12 years old (of course, there are
exceptions, but this is the general rule). There are those numbers
AGAIN!
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiW6Y7UJ0Zoar9vxJXzympIMtfRVfatZRPCiHGcE5FsYdHz27R8axFEn2KZDPTYCje27OSIY-tVE-uYgCV8ieAAiQVqr8PQ52E4X9c96stjnn6Bm5Y2t9aSSeB0s8qrepCl3vA-MhTYQU0/s1600/piano.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiW6Y7UJ0Zoar9vxJXzympIMtfRVfatZRPCiHGcE5FsYdHz27R8axFEn2KZDPTYCje27OSIY-tVE-uYgCV8ieAAiQVqr8PQ52E4X9c96stjnn6Bm5Y2t9aSSeB0s8qrepCl3vA-MhTYQU0/s1600/piano.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="text-decoration: none;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>"Piano
For Kids" </i></span></span>
</div>
<ul>
<li><div align="LEFT">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>"The
best time</b> to start piano lessons is generally between the ages
of 6 and 10. Most piano teachers consider the start of the
second or third grade to be the optimum time to start lessons.
The children are mature enough and have learned enough about
language and math to succeed as long as they are interested and have
your support."</span></span></div>
</li>
<li><div align="LEFT">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>"This
is not to say</b> that your kid will be unsuccessful starting before
or after this age range. Some children start as early as 4 and
some teenagers and many adults have begun the study of piano with
great success. </span></span>
</div>
</li>
<li><div align="LEFT">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><b>"The
sooner your child starts piano</b></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
after the age of 5 or 6, the better. If you wait until after
they turn 12 the brain has 'Hard-wired' to the point that progress
is slower and is further complicated by the onset of puberty. Plus,
an early start in music helps the brain develop in other ways. The
</span></span><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.amc-music.com/musicmaking/thebrain.htm" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i><b>American
Music Conference</b></i></span></span></a><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">
says 'The news has been hard to miss: in study after study,
scientists are finding correlations between music making and some of
the deepest workings of the human brain.'"</span></span></span></div>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<center>
<blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<div align="CENTER">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><i>"The
timing of the start of piano lessons and the selection of a
teacher that is right for your child are very important in the
success of piano lessons."</i></span></span></div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 60%px;"><tbody>
<tr>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</center>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="text-decoration: none;">Source:
</span><u><a href="http://www.dollarhide.com/pianoforkids.htm">http://www.dollarhide.com/pianoforkids.htm</a></u></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center; text-decoration: none;">
------------------------------------------------------------</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="text-decoration: none;">"Public schools usually
begin their instrumental programs around 3</span><sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">rd</span></sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">
or 4</span><sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">th</span></sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">
grade, when most children have reached a good place to learn music in
their emotional, physical, and educational development. This is a
reasonably safe time to start piano lessons for just about any child.</span><br />
However, many children want to take lessons even earlier because
of a favorite artist, an older sibling, or just a passion for music
that they have. Many children are perfectly capable of starting
private piano lessons even earlier than 3<sup>rd</sup> grade."</blockquote>
Source:
<a href="http://voices.yahoo.com/the-right-age-begin-piano-lessons-2817226.html">http://voices.yahoo.com/the-right-age-begin-piano-lessons-2817226.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Now, the significance of this relating to this hypothesis is that
there are certain age-specific times in human development at which
learning to master a skill set is optimal. Why would it be any
different when it comes to parenting? It is my contention that the
optimal time for a Female to first become a Mother is during the
13-21 Fibonacci cycle. This has everything to do with 1) the
ABILITY to conceive after the onset on menses, but, 2) before the
full development of the prefrontal cortex. Like learning to play the
piano well, learning to be a good Mother is much easier if done
within this optimal age "window," before which, it is
physically impossible, and after which, it is intellectually more
difficult (this is assuming a Natural culture exists which is
supportive of the teenage Mother; obviously, with the current Kultural
stigma and socio-economic demands of Industry, the mental side of
teenage pregnancy is skewed).<br />
<br />
<h4>
</h4>
<h4>
<u>The Prefrontal Cortex</u></h4>
<h4>
</h4>
<div style="text-decoration: none;">
The prefrontal cortex is the part of
the brain that assists in rational decision making. It becomes fully
developed around 21 years old.</div>
<div style="border-bottom: 1px solid #000000; border-left: none; border-right: none; border-top: none; padding-bottom: 0.03in; padding-left: 0in; padding-right: 0in; padding-top: 0in;">
<span style="text-decoration: none;">[*21 again. Now, it seems that
there is some dispute over this. There was a time not long ago, that
"scientists" thought the brain was fully developed at 14.
Later, they found out about the development of the prefrontal cortex
between 14 and 21 (hmmm ... there's that cycle again). Most
recently, "scientists" are claiming that the prefrontal
cortex continues to develop until the age of 25 ... now, this just
happens to coincide with a time of extremely protracted adolescence
due to Kulture. In my opinion, this is propaganda to further
protract adolescence, and they are using the extremes to define the
means. I think there is evidence to support this in the 2</span><sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">nd</span></sup><span style="text-decoration: none;">
article quoted below, in which the title quote claims 25, but the
very next paragraph indicates 21. It is quite possible that </span><i><span style="text-decoration: none;">some</span></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">,
probably a very few, people don't have a fully developed prefrontal
cortex until 25, but this number is negligible. Also, on the
cognitive tests they used to formulate this theory, the fact that
people answer the questions as if their brains aren't fully developed
could be a direct result of the Kulture we live in. This is an
argument for a different time. For the time being, I'll stick with
21.]</span></span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnhpCVBuERUlFY4R8fex3waShcKZnLH2o0yITxirE88h00aj6xTdJ0SPfLJQhHmqGHMNG5sOXFWZRRJu_jcpXBaIQlZUXtB6jXhXl-EJ3USykbM0Gna7IzN_cNcsR1pOUT0CAe0K_dlwg/s1600/level04prefrontalcortex.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnhpCVBuERUlFY4R8fex3waShcKZnLH2o0yITxirE88h00aj6xTdJ0SPfLJQhHmqGHMNG5sOXFWZRRJu_jcpXBaIQlZUXtB6jXhXl-EJ3USykbM0Gna7IzN_cNcsR1pOUT0CAe0K_dlwg/s1600/level04prefrontalcortex.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">"The
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;"><b>prefrontal
cortex</b></span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">
(</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;"><b>PFC</b></span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">)
is the </span></span><u><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anterior"><span style="font-style: normal;">anterior</span></a></u><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">
part of the </span></span><u><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontal_lobes"><span style="font-style: normal;">frontal
lobes</span></a></u><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">
of the </span></span><u><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain"><span style="font-style: normal;">brain</span></a></u><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">,
lying in front of the </span></span><u><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_motor_cortex"><span style="font-style: normal;">motor</span></a></u><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">
and </span></span><u><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premotor_cortex"><span style="font-style: normal;">premotor</span></a></u><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">
areas.</span></span><br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2856192009339970452" name="cite_ref-pmid19833485_1-0"></a><a href="https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2856192009339970452" name="cite_ref-pmid12217179_2-0"></a>
This brain region has been implicated in planning complex cognitive
behavior, personality expression, decision making and moderating
social behavior.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefrontal_cortex#cite_note-pmid19833485-1">[1]</a>
The basic activity of this brain region is considered to be
orchestration of thoughts and actions in accordance with internal
goals.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefrontal_cortex#cite_note-pmid12217179-2">[2]</a><br />
The most typical <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology">psychological</a>
term for functions carried out by the prefrontal cortex area is
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_system">executive
function</a>. Executive function relates to abilities to
differentiate among conflicting thoughts, determine good and bad,
better and best, same and different, future consequences of current
activities, working toward a defined goal, prediction of outcomes,
expectation based on actions, and social "control" (the
ability to suppress urges that, if not suppressed, could lead to
socially unacceptable outcomes).<br />
Many authors have indicated an integral link between a person's
personality and the functions of the prefrontal cortex."</blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<div style="border-bottom: 1px solid #000000; border-left: none; border-right: none; border-top: none; padding-bottom: 0.03in; padding-left: 0in; padding-right: 0in; padding-top: 0in;">
Source: Wikipedia</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">"Parents
need to realize the rational part of a teen's brain isn't fully
developed and won't be until he or she is 25 years old or so."
<br />–Jana Martin, Ph.D., psychologist and spokeswoman for the
American Psychological Association</span></span></b></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Science is unraveling the biological reasons that teens act
like teens. Recent research has found adult and teen brains work
differently. Their brains are wired in a way that floods them with
emotional responses to external events. Adults think with the
prefrontal cortex, the brain's rational part, but teens process
information with the amygdala, the emotional part. The amygdala is
part of the limbic system of the brain, which is fully functioning
and utilized by age 13-14 years. The prefrontal cortex fully develops
between the ages of 18-21."</blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Source: yourteen.org</blockquote>
<br />
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
Just how would
the development of the prefrontal cortex interfere with first
becoming a mother? Look at the functions and results of the fully
developed prefrontal cortex: orchestration of thoughts and actions in
accordance with INTERNAL GOALS, PERSONALITY EXPRESSION, etc. In
other words, a person is a more complete, defined INDIVIDUAL after
the PFC is fully developed. So, after 21, we have an complete
individual, whole unto herself, with goals and set personality. Once
an individual is defined, most often in this Kulture in regard to
lifestyle, employment, and social life, everything is SELF-oriented.
The farther one gets from 21, the MORE DEFINED the individual
becomes, set in her ways as being whole unto herself. The child
introduced after this becomes, perhaps, an OBJECT outside herself to
which she must adjust.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWqP6FTAahXsx_GMMDZ3FF3qY8pVfzyDRnEevTsd4wRETDMEy_aMgvOh8Ro6RKX299PdeRe__OOdn36zhRWGg0jmCtN0KNWFYUh9osI7k8wIujvRiruHFETcRyuQce2b6dKuGJ_nirMQk/s1600/new-jeep-cherokee-28-crd-mother-small-15892.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="224" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWqP6FTAahXsx_GMMDZ3FF3qY8pVfzyDRnEevTsd4wRETDMEy_aMgvOh8Ro6RKX299PdeRe__OOdn36zhRWGg0jmCtN0KNWFYUh9osI7k8wIujvRiruHFETcRyuQce2b6dKuGJ_nirMQk/s1600/new-jeep-cherokee-28-crd-mother-small-15892.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
Juxtapose this
Individual with the teenage brain which is highly emotional, who
still internalizes external events, who is not set in personality or
SELF, but open to being part of a greater whole. With the
introduction of a child (and probably a man), which brain would be
better suited to BOND with another for the first time? Motherhood,
children, and possibly husband would ALL then become part of the
WHOLE person she becomes when the PFC does develop. Her goals would
then include FAMILY and Motherhood would be PART of her personality.
The child introduced during this time becomes a PART of her.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
I'm not saying
that there aren't good Mothers who had their first children after 21.
My wife is an example of one. What I am saying is that it is much
more of a STRUGGLE to be a good Mother if the first child is born
after 21, when it is much easier – if the culture is in line with
Nature – if the first child is born between the ages of 13 and 21,
17 being the mean optimal age for first pregnancy.
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal;">
<h4>
<u>Whoa!</u></h4>
<h4>
</h4>
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
... SLOW DOWN!
I can hear the gears turning – what kind of twisted pedophile
claims that 13 and 14 year-olds should be having children? Uhg!
Children having children! (All Kultural meme responses) Not MY
little girl!</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
What you have to
understand is the importance of the Fibonacci Means and Bell Curve
distribution. If you look at [Fig. 1], you will see the distribution
around the F-Mean of 17 is 68%, meaning over two-thirds of the first
pregnancies we are theorizing would be between the ages of 16 and 18,
with a corresponding 14% between 18-19. A full 84% would occur at 16
and above, and 95% between the ages of 15 and 19.
</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
[Fig. 1]</div>
<span style="text-decoration: none;"><img align="BOTTOM" border="0" height="299" name="graphics1" src="http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060916084310/psychology/images/thumb/b/bb/Normal_distribution_and_scales.gif/1000px-Normal_distribution_and_scales.gif" width="641" />
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
Source:
psychology.wikia.com</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
This is a
perfect fit for the 13-21 Fibonacci cycle. If you put 17 years at 0,
+1 becomes 18, and so on to +4 at 21. -1 is 16, -4 is 13, and ages
in between fall on distribution points.</div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">
Even so, a the
typical response from the typical person raised in this Kulture would
believe that even this distribution is far too young for women to
enter into Motherhood. This is most certainly due to mal-adapted
gender roles created by the Artificial world of Industry imposed upon
the populace, and it all starts in school.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<h4>
<u>Education</u></h4>
<h4>
</h4>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The entire Educational System is based
on it the Phi Ratio as expressed in Fibonacci whole numbers. This is
not a coincidence, and as you will see, forces the majority into
lop-sided pair bonding relationship patterns that directly conflict
with Nature.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsBSbJkC4mFJD-OtnaDCMBnKYO6WO1bWGNg5vlvgfsBmUQF_m2r44uzKdUynrUcIIQlQSA4ilDCXtU-Tl68MqY5h_erg6L-CEu47iZ5xPsmBG2BkFNNJ0Dk0PLY6JcLfdzt-sSQSWE9Ng/s1600/505452676_740dfc0e43_z.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="124" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsBSbJkC4mFJD-OtnaDCMBnKYO6WO1bWGNg5vlvgfsBmUQF_m2r44uzKdUynrUcIIQlQSA4ilDCXtU-Tl68MqY5h_erg6L-CEu47iZ5xPsmBG2BkFNNJ0Dk0PLY6JcLfdzt-sSQSWE9Ng/s1600/505452676_740dfc0e43_z.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
</div>
<br />
At (5*) our children are sent to institutionalized education. Kindergarten through 2nd grade are <br />
designed as a colorful, playful introduction to school. In 3rd grade (8*) things change and become more serious ... you will find some of the bitchiest teachers in any school at the 3rd grade level, which begins a more rigorous academic agenda. 3rd-5th and 6th-8th are divided at the mean, with 6th-8th grades approaching a more “secondary school” atmosphere, changing classes and teachers more often. These steps are built into the pedagogy. By the end of 8th grade, most students have turned 14, and thus ends/begins another FC 13 – 21.<br />
<br />
Traditionally, most formal education ended at the completion of 8th grade (that is why High School is often still referred to as “secondary school"). Most women did not attend after 8th grade. Usually, affluent boys attended secondary school, with the other boys taking apprenticeships, laboring on family farms, or generally finding their ways in the world. Secondary school (High School) ends with graduation at a Fibonacci Mean age of 17/18. Some of the wealthy or very intelligent went on to college, which ends upon graduation at another Fibonacci age of (*21).<br />
<br />
Now, as a matter of course, ALL young people enter High School, and MOST go to some form of college. Boys and girls, rich and poor. The relevance of this is that during this CRUCIAL developmental phase (13-21), males and females are pushed together in a sociological quagmire. At a time when the young woman's biological instinct is to look for a mate and start a family, she is force-fed a diet of boys who are critically incapable of fulfilling the role of Patriarch. <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5PcUstJeXl7oKLhbXAmRZASrgyO5peMdeufYGRAmWORTyFSo-06U_hDZx1bCUF6TAjRW57MfR3mwhuRSIRdzknoTYEBAOL8NNr780GTpTAaVPN-XMfiMyKamL0YkiblfM37B6Q-GloBA/s1600/stupid-girl-21281246.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5PcUstJeXl7oKLhbXAmRZASrgyO5peMdeufYGRAmWORTyFSo-06U_hDZx1bCUF6TAjRW57MfR3mwhuRSIRdzknoTYEBAOL8NNr780GTpTAaVPN-XMfiMyKamL0YkiblfM37B6Q-GloBA/s1600/stupid-girl-21281246.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<h4>
<u>Phi-losophical Differences</u></h4>
<h4>
</h4>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
As you can see,
the Phi Ratio, or, Golden Mean, appears to be ubiquitous in human
development. I'm certainly not the first person to recognize this,
as it would appear that even the educational pedagogy follows this
paradigm.
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
The only
question is: how is this fact used or abused by Kulture to affect our
experience of life?
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Part 3 will delve into the Male role in
reproduction and adverse effects of the similar-age pair-bonding in
long-term relationships for both Males and Females.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3.3.13</div>
Whajonahlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16440976955700081568noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2856192009339970452.post-3053323448007969832013-02-24T03:02:00.001-08:002013-03-07T20:44:30.025-08:00The Phi Ratio and Human Reproduction<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5qR2-mTdNwwDRa4hrVmK2WjUaIcogZXE_plZ-KCaTHns4DDg8wuzjiiCZr1uulXUR6tLe3I_BqVn1uopDGhOu7-vYG5ClNojXzG1LNOgdpi2bmuS8sr2f-nwtUW5oec2PEVfsqE6SgQE/s1600/thegoldenratio.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5qR2-mTdNwwDRa4hrVmK2WjUaIcogZXE_plZ-KCaTHns4DDg8wuzjiiCZr1uulXUR6tLe3I_BqVn1uopDGhOu7-vYG5ClNojXzG1LNOgdpi2bmuS8sr2f-nwtUW5oec2PEVfsqE6SgQE/s1600/thegoldenratio.jpg" height="263" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
The Phi ratio, or Golden Ratio, is expressed throughout the biological world, often expressed in whole number approximations. It only follows that it would appear in the patterns of human development and reproduction. By applying the Fibonacci series (a mathematical series that approximates the Phi ratio) to human age and gender development, specific patterns, means, and "harmonics" are evident. Unfortunately, these discoveries relating the Phi ratio to human reproduction are in direct conflict with modern Kulture ("Kulture," as distinguished from "culture," is simply culture that conflicts with our biology).<br />
<br />
Part 1 will illustrate the specific numbers, patterns, and "means and harmonics" that emerge when a Male/Female pair is offset at a rational point, that point being 21 and 13. This hypothesis suggests that a Female human should begin reproduction during an earlier Fibonacci cycle (13-21) than a Male human (21-34), rather than the current Kultural pair bonding of similar-aged partners. Part 2 will discuss the implications of the hypothesis versus the effects of the unnatural coupling that modern reproductive Kulture produces. <br />
<br />
Part 1 -- Means and Harmonics<br />
<br />
Graph A<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh42QJBtzv2c3mSL-asKZcbK25rzvOsnan8zKJQeRp_REPnquLy8t0xqPzGwePbFHFw0YEweO2gPdvKADIznaFPpEmpRaJWTWgeAVcyszzcv2utGG1np4d6c_59usdiz8k_t2rTmd_R3Pk/s1600/001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh42QJBtzv2c3mSL-asKZcbK25rzvOsnan8zKJQeRp_REPnquLy8t0xqPzGwePbFHFw0YEweO2gPdvKADIznaFPpEmpRaJWTWgeAVcyszzcv2utGG1np4d6c_59usdiz8k_t2rTmd_R3Pk/s640/001.jpg" height="464" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Graph A represents the Fibonacci numbers as they apply to human age "cycles," henceforth referred to as Fibonacci Cycles. The Fibonacci series is as follows: 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89, ... with each number correlating to age and the periods within representing distinct developmental periods in humans, male and female. The top section represents the female age and the bottom represents the male age when the cycles are offset at 13(F) and 21(M). The shaded areas show the cycles in which the hypothesis suggests males and females would begin procreation. The "means" of each cycle are represented as well, being of utmost importance. For example, though 13(F) is the beginning of the cycle (and, not coincidentally, the average age of menarche), 21(F) is the end of the cycle, therefore 17(F) is the "mean," or "average" age of that particular cycle, and these means are of great significance.<br />
<br />
*It is important to remember that when dealing with Fibonacci cycles, they are always approximations, just as the Fibonacci series only approximates Phi. For example, 8-13 could be inclusive or exclusive ... is 34 the end of low-risk female fertility, or is 35 the beginning of high risk pregnancy? The periods between cycles are somewhat elastic.<br />
<br />
Notes<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWtW76xtddaGkCKeVmD85hEgxBI0I71AA3hxQfsxdZy2JOj3DLOjzsEp_1XL_V_0XQq-prQ2FEff9N9xGrMqVEI1z030UuiPZhk-isKbSu1-6eIp8CnXV8CMPOWxLj7ph3sM_CUr78PEQ/s1600/002.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWtW76xtddaGkCKeVmD85hEgxBI0I71AA3hxQfsxdZy2JOj3DLOjzsEp_1XL_V_0XQq-prQ2FEff9N9xGrMqVEI1z030UuiPZhk-isKbSu1-6eIp8CnXV8CMPOWxLj7ph3sM_CUr78PEQ/s640/002.jpg" height="464" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Notes indicate the significance of Graph A as it relates to points in human development when the male and female is offset at 21 and 13, respectively, and touches on statistics as to why they should be.<br />
<br />
Fibonacci Numbers:<br />
8 -- early onset Menarche (first menses or period) is DEFINED as before 8 years old<br />
13 -- the average age of Menarche; average age of growth spurt (14) in boys<br />
21 -- prefrontal cortex fully developed<br />
34 -- after which all pregnancies are considered "high risk"<br />
55 -- the mode (most common age) on the list of oldest "natural" births<br />
<br />
Fibonacci Means:<br />
10.5 -- average age of Thelarche (breast development)<br />
17 -- Definition of late onset Mencarche; average age of completion of growth in men<br />
27.5 -- 2nd generation significance (next graph)<br />
44.5 -- Mid 40s is average age of Perimenopause <br />
72 -- average last year of life, male ... average age of death, male (73)<br />
<br />
Harmonics:<br />
72(F) intersects 80(M) -- average ages of death, M - 73.2; F - 79.7<br />
<br />
72(M) intersects 64(F)<br />
44.5(M) intersects 36.5(F) ... the mean of 64 and 36.5 is 50.25 -- 51 is the avg. age menopause<br />
<br />
72(M) intersects 64(F) ... the mean of 64 and 55 is 59.5 -- see below<br />
63(M) intersects 55(F) ... the mean of 63 and 55 is 59 -- the oldest known natural birth <br />
<br />
55(M) intersects 47(F) ... the mean of 55 and 47 is 51 -- the average age of Menopause<br />
<br />
17(M) intersects 9(F) ... 17+9=26, mean of 17 and 9 is 13 (Fibonacci #)<br />
<br />
34(M) intersects 26(F) ... 26/2=13 (Fibonacci #)<br />
<br />
The fact that by aligning the female 13 with the male 21 produces all these results is remarkable. But by taking it a step farther, to the 2nd generation, will there be any of these Phi coincidences?<br />
<br />
Graph B<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn85dxxUEFaoTZ-iyN_-NTLvWM0JkP2eXmjxpew2QyZOWZu-hNXJQCUMByKCJheYR543qYbE3doTmPIleIdePQwY_a8DAFaB6yNzZuNmGU64kEjnCdr138doF5OntObY6-mBywRERwc-0/s1600/003.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn85dxxUEFaoTZ-iyN_-NTLvWM0JkP2eXmjxpew2QyZOWZu-hNXJQCUMByKCJheYR543qYbE3doTmPIleIdePQwY_a8DAFaB6yNzZuNmGU64kEjnCdr138doF5OntObY6-mBywRERwc-0/s640/003.jpg" height="464" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Graph B shows a Father who's daughter is born on the Cycle Mean of 27.5. As it clearly shows, at his next Cycle Mean of 44.5, she is at her Cycle Mean of 17. When he reaches the Fibonacci 55, she is at her Cycle Mean of 27.5, and when the Father at the approximate age of death for a male, the Cycle Mean of 72, she is at a cycle mean of 44.5, which is the average age of the onset of Perimenopause. Let's take it to a third generation ...<br />
<br />
Graph C<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvSKncCXTnu_zTtTUv6aCs53MLF_oau59G8S0MXEteX_gXcrpc-TDexPHCA39Tj1ymFE5C0JBKK2WmyzHZyl-B3wYq66JmVM99MfSKYWYBjDFwbRu7IdFO3YXbFSqeW1OPzqEprzbaiRs/s1600/004.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvSKncCXTnu_zTtTUv6aCs53MLF_oau59G8S0MXEteX_gXcrpc-TDexPHCA39Tj1ymFE5C0JBKK2WmyzHZyl-B3wYq66JmVM99MfSKYWYBjDFwbRu7IdFO3YXbFSqeW1OPzqEprzbaiRs/s640/004.jpg" height="464" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />
This graph plots 3 generation of women, each daughter born on the Mother's Cycle Mean of 17. We'll call the top Grandma, the middle Mama, and the bottom, Daughter (G,M,D, for short). The first "meeting of the means" is between the Grandma and the mother, at G's 27.5 and M's 10.5. The next has obvious significance, as G is reaching the age of high risk pregnancy, Fibonacci 34, M is at the Cycle Mean of 17, beginning reproduction. When M hits Fibonacci 34, the same instance occurs for D, 17; however, at the same time, G is at 51, the average age of Menopause! D hits 21 precisely at G's Fibonacci 55, and later, when M hits 55, G is at 72. Again, 55 is the "mode" on the list of oldest known "natural" childbirths, and 72 is the average age of a male's death.<br />
<br />
In Girls, Thelarche (8-13, avg. 10.5), Pubarche (8.5-13.5, avg. 11), Growth Spurt (10-12.5, avg. 11.23), and Menarche (10.5-14.5 avg. 12.5), all trend toward the 8-13 Fibonacci Cycle, and the conclusion that the average girl is biologically complete to begin reproduction during the 13-21 Fibonacci Cycle.<br />
<br />
With Boys Pubarche (10-14, avg. 12), Growth Spurt (11-17, avg. 14), and Completion of Growth (15-20, avg. 17), all trend toward the Fibonacci Cycle of 13-21, making these still developmental years for males.<br />
<br />
The hypothesis suggests that males and female cycles diverge in purpose, specifically during the 13-21 cycle.<br />
The evidence in the means and harmonics of the resulting shift in Fibonacci Cycles supports this as being a natural function of human development.<br />
<br />
As will be discussed in Part 2, there are natural reasons for this shift between male and female development due to the natural gender roles each must fulfill for the best propagation of the species, despite what the current Kultural paradigm promotes and perpetuates. <br />
<br />
2/24/13Whajonahlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16440976955700081568noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2856192009339970452.post-13276717956141736022012-05-18T11:56:00.000-07:002012-05-19T14:52:10.615-07:00<br />
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2856192009339970452" name="Am1">The Only Time to Yell, “Fire!” is in a Crowded Theater</a></span></b><br />
<b>by</b><br />
<b>Graham Crandall (Whajonahle)</b></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><shapetype coordsize="21600,21600" filled="f" id="_x0000_t75" o:preferrelative="t" o:spt="75" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" stroked="f"><stroke joinstyle="miter"></stroke><formulas><f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"></f><f eqn="sum @0 1 0"></f><f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"></f><f eqn="prod @2 1 2"></f><f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"></f><f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"></f><f eqn="sum @0 0 1"></f><f eqn="prod @6 1 2"></f><f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"></f><f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"></f><f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"></f><f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></f></formulas><path gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" o:extrusionok="f"></path><lock aspectratio="t" v:ext="edit"></lock></shapetype></span></b><b><span style="font-size: 18pt;"></span></b></div>
<div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjz4a_rki-aquULwg0UfU8_IjqoKytEbMBgzUuhpcCUO5rz7GfgSu4ErhtT2MCVCXmRFmA0CVWy8x5nBobR1OAKgOfW-GqiMaNnlZMVwqNsXMllo_G7dMC7PmAyXMZTy8doP_tfCSeOEgQ/s1600/book_burn.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjz4a_rki-aquULwg0UfU8_IjqoKytEbMBgzUuhpcCUO5rz7GfgSu4ErhtT2MCVCXmRFmA0CVWy8x5nBobR1OAKgOfW-GqiMaNnlZMVwqNsXMllo_G7dMC7PmAyXMZTy8doP_tfCSeOEgQ/s640/book_burn.jpg" width="480" /></a></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<b>Amendment 1</b><b> - Freedom of Religion, Press, </b><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.</b> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.</div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-size: 18pt; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">The Only Time to Yell, “Fire!” is in a crowded theater ...</span></span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Though I had planned on a different article being my second blog (working on it), a topic was brought up on “Inside the Eye” the other night that I had to briefly comment on …</span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">During the show, someone said that without the right to freedom of speech/freedom of expression, we don’t have the basis for any other rights. I couldn’t agree more. </span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The US Supreme Court’s decision to limit free speech – the notable, “ … a person doesn’t have the right to falsely yell, ‘Fire!’ in a crowded theater” – is one of the two WORST decisions ever made by the Court. </span></div>
<div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8KC0IYGkbIGnEu7n49vzYldew1QpdX09d0JUXSJJi_WnidXfp69JZe2ErHL9Xy3TuE-dd16JOWHEUHu4aICFkQKZs_DK12JIcdq05t-xZ721gfTG83goQbI0mpcUnkQSoyJUUSS7EaPo/s1600/history_184_1_650.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="221" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8KC0IYGkbIGnEu7n49vzYldew1QpdX09d0JUXSJJi_WnidXfp69JZe2ErHL9Xy3TuE-dd16JOWHEUHu4aICFkQKZs_DK12JIcdq05t-xZ721gfTG83goQbI0mpcUnkQSoyJUUSS7EaPo/s320/history_184_1_650.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri;">1</span><span style="font-family: Calibri;">919 US Supreme Court</span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">A Specious Metaphor</span></span></b></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In the first place, what if the theater IS, in fact, on fire? The case the court decided upon was NOT about “crowded theaters,” but POLITICALLY DANGEROUS SPEECH. In such a case, WHO has the right to decided if the “theater” is truly on fire? If the person expressing himself believes it burning, that person has not only the right, but the responsibility to yell, “Fire!” This relates directly to the RIGHT and RESPONSIBILITY the author of the 1<sup>st</sup> Amendment expressed in the Declaration of Independence 11 years previous: </span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri;"> “ … </span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” -- Thomas Jefferson, et.al.,<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Declaration of Independence</i></span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., the Supreme Court Justice who wrote the “Fire!” opinion, later doubted his own decision, and voted AGAINST the application of the opinion in a similar case.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;"><div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrdOSLvV6HnaWBFX9q_ikqBAQRq1H-Sj1zSr8UWzwN8w_XeTC8X1qBnQcWp04wNeOshwiL_7pJMOyLI0KlfEHwXFwT5v0WYI0calLMmllYV2GxCeKr4OChDI_pXxPNhk-Zr-KElpqD1X0/s1600/Oliver-Wendell-Homes-Jr_-300x250.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="166" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrdOSLvV6HnaWBFX9q_ikqBAQRq1H-Sj1zSr8UWzwN8w_XeTC8X1qBnQcWp04wNeOshwiL_7pJMOyLI0KlfEHwXFwT5v0WYI0calLMmllYV2GxCeKr4OChDI_pXxPNhk-Zr-KElpqD1X0/s200/Oliver-Wendell-Homes-Jr_-300x250.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.</div>
<div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
</span><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">Secondly, it is not the speech or expression that should ever NEED to be limited. To take the “crowded theater” metaphor literally, if a person were to yell, “Fire!” in a theater that was not ablaze, and people were injured as a result, it would be the reckless action of that person in totality, not the word or speech itself. The same malicious action could be taken by pulling a fire alarm, or lighting a smoke bomb in the theater, both more likely to get the desired reaction (a crowd frantically trying to exit a theater). By simply falsely yelling, “Fire!” in a theater, the crowd’s reaction could just as likely be, “Shut up! I’m trying to watch the movie, you moron!” </span></div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">Irresponsible speech, such as “Fire!” should be equated more to “libel” or “slander.” Certainly, a person has the RIGHT to make libelous or slanderous statements, and the 1<sup>st</sup> Amendment rarely is invoked; rather, these cases are judged on the injuries and damages caused by the utilization of the right to speak freely.</span></div>
</div>
<div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTe3apbZlSuX0Ow03w_6QfOVNNJh0-vdOqrlym33pDIT0G9sBxVK8AJVOVceNQUGQ2z1wyyjb-UaTz-h1PJabc2u7Q4dYCzx9-G7DVUvm6yx3JNETvCUxvsbYvKCnMDescTZhFjDGOKp8/s1600/in+touch.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTe3apbZlSuX0Ow03w_6QfOVNNJh0-vdOqrlym33pDIT0G9sBxVK8AJVOVceNQUGQ2z1wyyjb-UaTz-h1PJabc2u7Q4dYCzx9-G7DVUvm6yx3JNETvCUxvsbYvKCnMDescTZhFjDGOKp8/s200/in+touch.jpg" width="152" /></a></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;"></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;"></span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">However, if indeed the motivation to shout, “Fire!” is in to a political or social warning – which the theater metaphor was clearly used to represent -- the voracity of the warning call is an extremely grey area. Unfortunately, the analogy endorsed by the Court could easily be used to silence speech which those with the power to do so deem dangerous.</span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">Speech or expression of any kind should not be limited in any way, ever. The ONLY time to yell, “Fire!” is in a “crowded theater” because the biggest issues effect the most people. And when the warning is needed, there is inevitably an opposition with both the cache and the cause to claim that nothing is burning. The Court’s decision to limit speech opened the door to the current environment of Political Correctness which is on the verge of absurd. </span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;"><div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKxLb3IsE95ReYxSbr0eYzFb3__FhDoNV6R2Sp8dUb6GhbiAwcji1DlmWscUoQZITkLhsF7FJgvEKaUltaFn7ran9bFFE9krwbX0VxnM5UaNIJ7g60fB61IbumtKdLgMyZ3iNm2STxyy0/s1600/noh8_photo_01-450x450.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKxLb3IsE95ReYxSbr0eYzFb3__FhDoNV6R2Sp8dUb6GhbiAwcji1DlmWscUoQZITkLhsF7FJgvEKaUltaFn7ran9bFFE9krwbX0VxnM5UaNIJ7g60fB61IbumtKdLgMyZ3iNm2STxyy0/s400/noh8_photo_01-450x450.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
</span><div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">This picture says it all, or doesn't, as it were. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">Three other quick thoughts on the 1<sup>st</sup> Amendment, while on the subject:</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">ON BULLYING</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">The current concept of “Bullying” is an extremely dangerous step toward indoctrinating the youth to the concept that they DON’T, in fact, have the right to free speech. The term “Bullying” has been redefined to mean almost anything that hurts another’s feelings. This is nothing more than an insidious attempt to control the expression of mindful perceptions and values. To this end (and for the purpose of artistic freedom), the wording of the 1<sup>st</sup> Amendment should include, “the RIGHT to OFFEND.” This includes the right to be mean, hurtful, obnoxious, and insulting; sometimes the TRUTH is mean, hurtful, obnoxious, or insulting. The efforts in regard to “Bullying” should be directed at learning how to deal with ideas and words that offend one’s sensibilities. “Sticks and Stones,” man.</span></div>
<div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5oRL-uJrE9S7C98XhRshnepSVNiwroPb1zqUF4Mkr4-yaP6gtZmkkOt23i-YX20gh6X8fwfVWLhpI4FpiKi4wmAcR0FtWZQhAP495LNr63CjmGB7F3eo32J6N8rbdqGOXxzm41M0jgec/s1600/bullying.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5oRL-uJrE9S7C98XhRshnepSVNiwroPb1zqUF4Mkr4-yaP6gtZmkkOt23i-YX20gh6X8fwfVWLhpI4FpiKi4wmAcR0FtWZQhAP495LNr63CjmGB7F3eo32J6N8rbdqGOXxzm41M0jgec/s640/bullying.jpg" width="452" /></a></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">As you can see, the Noose on this Anti-Bullying propaganda campaign is composed of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">WORDS</i>. Bullying and “teasing” are not the same thing, never were. It should be called and Anti-Teasing or Anti-Insult campaign, but that would expose the ridiculous nature of it. No one wants to see anyone hurt themselves, and teaching oversensitivity to teasing and insults only CONTRIBUTES to the problem. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">ON HATE CRIME</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">In much the same way, the idea of “hate crime” is nothing more than punishing a person for his or her THOUGHTS. The crime should be judged on the manner of the crime committed. If someone is beaten to death, the motivation of such a beating is irrelevant. To charge a person with a “hate crime” is essentially charging a person with THINKING a certain way. If two similar offenses occur, and one deemed a “hate crime” carries a greater sentence, this additional time is added only for the thoughts in the person’s head when the crime was committed. <i>Ipso Facto</i>, the charge of “hate crime” is a “thought crime.”</span></div>
<div align="center" class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjD31aeoa6R_FjGuJ8zYgry7YXENSnWcVOb1UIWCwcxK0Bqln7tfqNg86ewYADCmJixcPEW-8bY05rQBN7XNl_8NzvJUtRL-CEeHNYaov0h1AMaI3fgABrlKXgnaZKOPGKf-2Pv3lUsf3Y/s1600/thought+police.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjD31aeoa6R_FjGuJ8zYgry7YXENSnWcVOb1UIWCwcxK0Bqln7tfqNg86ewYADCmJixcPEW-8bY05rQBN7XNl_8NzvJUtRL-CEeHNYaov0h1AMaI3fgABrlKXgnaZKOPGKf-2Pv3lUsf3Y/s1600/thought+police.jpg" /></a></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;"></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;"></span></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">ON IDIOTS</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">To illustrate how ignorant many people are about the concept of “Freedom of Religion”: A little over a decade ago, a radio personality was discussing a French court decision to ban Muslim headdress from public schools. The female sidekick stated she was in full support of the decision because, “That’s what separation of Church and State means.” Ugh! Quite the opposite, Separation of Church and State would imply that the school or court could NOT infringe upon the rights of the people whose religious beliefs required they wear a particular garment. By “banning” this practice, the State infringed upon that person’s Freedom of Religion. The idea that this idiot inverted the notion without being challenged or corrected by any of her cohorts (in fact, they AGREED with her perversion of the concept) on a radio show with a large market share in a city of 1.5 million has annoyed me to this day.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7zcenxJfEfBHcJuf3nr7eMm5uTYO0KU-3bFkRp3bWHw2elL4QZJXRW6hQ0Dnujd3_m4cqbQvE-F2c0K4mBtdnCrd_6y42G4cqOD3GcvxcWgQLIFTpvGJmfFYDuNK7hdXmo4ywtZCeGuE/s1600/bimbo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7zcenxJfEfBHcJuf3nr7eMm5uTYO0KU-3bFkRp3bWHw2elL4QZJXRW6hQ0Dnujd3_m4cqbQvE-F2c0K4mBtdnCrd_6y42G4cqOD3GcvxcWgQLIFTpvGJmfFYDuNK7hdXmo4ywtZCeGuE/s320/bimbo.jpg" width="298" /></a></div>
</span><div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%;">NEVER SHUT UP!</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: left; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">Speech is merely the verbal expression of the ideas, thoughts, and feelings inside a person’s mind. The 1<sup>st</sup> Amendment addresses the most BASIC right: the right to express these ideas, thoughts, and feelings. Without the right to expression, we CANNOT support any of the other Freedoms we are endowed with. At this time in history, we must vehemently (and VOCALLY) oppose the insidious attempts to erode what Jefferson deemed worthy of #1 on his Top Ten list.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_aU_qqY3H68Dt5NB9Y1huS-7IzYFgtZ1pTIkDgjP9Tbvoyz_wGkQ_UAz51xoqaBPKxM5xh3y3l_06htxFpMsluuVLdaz514UVXI2fZjoejq8FCGrS8vaUs-YS6lHcjSUHAdN18gH4qdo/s1600/pin.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" kba="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_aU_qqY3H68Dt5NB9Y1huS-7IzYFgtZ1pTIkDgjP9Tbvoyz_wGkQ_UAz51xoqaBPKxM5xh3y3l_06htxFpMsluuVLdaz514UVXI2fZjoejq8FCGrS8vaUs-YS6lHcjSUHAdN18gH4qdo/s320/pin.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div align="left" style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; text-align: center; text-indent: -0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<shape alt="thought-police" id="Picture_x0020_1" o:spid="_x0000_i1025" style="height: 176.25pt; mso-wrap-style: square; visibility: visible; width: 176.25pt;" type="#_x0000_t75"><imagedata o:title="thought-police" src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\gvcs\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image014.jpg"></imagedata></shape></div>Whajonahlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16440976955700081568noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2856192009339970452.post-16695998294679629052012-05-05T08:20:00.002-07:002013-03-07T20:45:48.034-08:00The One Word Spell<div style="text-align: center;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"></span><span style="color: #351c75; font-size: x-large;">The One Word</span><span style="font-size: x-large;"> </span><span style="color: #351c75; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-large;">Spell</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #351c75; font-family: Georgia; font-size: x-small;">by</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #351c75; font-family: Georgia; font-size: large;">Whajonahle</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img alt="Image Detail" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWjilKwzNYpT5Ay1G2FFErgDd-vYyjkog-VpigltwOEvUrbm6U9oC3fdTm0O0adZOpAixmhGtH6EwYVA-2diuKLWdhldOGxePhyd3vwuX0WbC0ZMWZoKrmp6l69q611hdBkVXTB1aspD8/s1600/magic_book_by_caglarcity.jpg" height="485" id="main-img" style="opacity: 1; visibility: visible;" title="Just Jemi: Book Order Magic" width="740" /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
I’ve been a writer for 24 years. However, this is my first attempt at this new
forum, the BLOG, the multi-media expression that appears to be the format of
choice in the post millennium para-reality.
The “art” of written expression certainly has evolved quickly, almost as
quickly as the attention span of the average person has dissipated. You’ve got to be entertaining now,
Jack! More pics and fewer words, and <span style="font-family: 'Bernard MT Condensed', serif;">Change Fonts </span>to
emphasize … get it man?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
I have my doubts whether this media creates a situation of a
million <i><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">Voces Clamantis in Deserto</span></i><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">, </span>providing people with the <span style="font-family: 'Bernard MT Condensed', serif;">illusion</span> of actually having a voice,
while only giving them an entirely fruitless but emotionally satisfying outlet
for their frustration, or whether it actually IS an opportunity to reach a zillion
readers around the world and make a difference in this insane, contrived,
controlled Kulture. I have a feeling the
former is true, and we’re all Winston Smiths, tossing peas against a brick
wall. Nevertheless, I have to give it a
go … I’ll begin by using the word Ken Kesey employed so effectively at the
beginning of his great novel, <u>Sometimes a Great Notion</u> – <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Harlow Solid Italic'; font-size: 20pt; line-height: 115%;">Listen … </span><span style="font-size: 20pt; line-height: 115%;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Harlow Solid Italic'; font-size: 20pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
There
is the BRAIN and there is the MIND. They
are two separate entities. The brain is
inside your skull and is an organic computer, a guidance mechanism, if you
will. <u>Psycho-Cybernetics</u>, by Maxwell
Maltz, described the brain as a guidance
mechanism, much like the self-correcting guidance systems used in torpedo
technology (if the torpedo starts to go off course, the mechanism corrects the
direction). If that theory were
introduced today, perhaps the metaphor used would be a GPS system. All the information, direction, and
programming from the external environment causes us to behave and take action
in certain directions, usually without any contemplation by the mind. Most of the decisions we make, the opinions
we have, or the conclusions we arrive at are completely thoughtless, stemming
directly from the subconscious mind and the way it has been programmed – the
“GPS system” simply takes over. Since
the Industrial Revolution, people have been forced to experience their lives
less and less as whole, sentient beings, and trapped predominately on the GPS
autopilot. With increasing technology,
this <b><span style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">Magic</span></b><b> </b>control
of human thoughts and behaviors has become increasingly enslaving to the
general population. <o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://tonyjack.org/images/brain%20thinker4.jpg" height="190" width="200" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Yes, I
use the word <b><span style="font-family: 'Lucida Calligraphy';"><span style="font-size: large;">Magic</span>
</span></b>because that‘s
exactly what it is. Our understanding of
Magic tends to be infantile. Magic is not the intangible, metaphysical
hocus pocus we have been led to believe, but is clearly defined by those
involved in the occulted practices simply as the “imposition of Will on
Reality.” Whether this imposition is of
scientific nature, such as the invention of the light bulb, or the manipulation
of mass consciousness, as through advertising, it is Magic, nonetheless. The old standard of the Zippo lighter to a
caveman being “magical” will suffice for now, though in later articles, …
er, <i>blogs</i>
… I will explore this concept, in itself, more.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
One
thing, however, is certain, that the <span style="font-family: 'Wide Latin', serif;">Will </span>originates in the MIND, not the brain. The mind is non-local, as Dr. Julian Jaynes
suggested in <u>The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral
Mind</u>. By exerting their will on you and
removing your focus from your mind (consciousness) toward your brain
(unconscious GPS system), they are effectively removing <span style="font-family: 'Wide Latin', serif;">YOUR
Will-</span>ful existence
and replacing it with theirs, obviously toward their ends. Just who “They” are is a topic for
later. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Harlow Solid Italic'; font-size: 20pt; line-height: 115%;">So …</span><span style="font-size: 20pt; line-height: 115%;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Harlow Solid Italic'; font-size: 20pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
How
does this particular Magic work?<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://www.smashinglists.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/11brain2axx4.jpg" height="146" width="200" />
</div>
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Like a
computer (perhaps the computer was developed as a personification, or an even
spookier thought: <i>vice versa</i>!), human
brains are programmable. We are born
with instincts (like BIOS in a computer, and even the instincts of the human
mind, such as the herding instinct, can be used against us) – the rest is programmed. It is important to remember that I am talking
about the BRAIN and not the MIND, which is an independent, contemplative,
cognizant entity. The main tool used to
program the human mind is <span style="font-family: 'Britannic Bold', sans-serif;">Language</span>.<span style="font-family: 'Britannic Bold', sans-serif;"> </span> Just as computer
programmers use computer languages to give instructions to their machines, our
parents, grandparents, teachers, churches, and yes, even the <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Calligraphy';">Magicians</span>, give us the programming that
“runs” our subconscious brains, and even our conscious minds, to some extent,
depending on how much we let the language interfere and define our mindful
perceptions. Just how readily we accept the presentation of
the world as it is given to us is confounding.
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
*<i>Consequently,
as the parental influence is diminished, the other influences (institutionalized
education, television, movies, the noise that passes for music, peer group
memes, etc.) have a greater influence on the collective worldview.</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Harlow Solid Italic'; font-size: 20pt; line-height: 115%;">When</span><span style="font-family: 'Harlow Solid Italic';">
</span>this language is
used in an insidious way, for example, for the acceptance of industrial servitude,
it is an <span style="font-family: 'Wide Latin', serif;">Imposition of Will </span>on others’ reality. This
is what a <b><span style="font-family: 'Lucida Calligraphy';">“Magic Spell”</span></b>
is, in all sincerity (it is no coincidence that we all take years of
“spelling” in “elementary” school). In
the following, I have taken one, simple example to help explain this use of
language as Magic …<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-family: 'Lucida Calligraphy'; font-size: 24pt; line-height: 115%;">The One Word Spell<o:p></o:p></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-family: 'Lucida Calligraphy'; font-size: 24pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<b>A</b> particular way words can be
used as spells is by one word having two separate, distinct meanings. This
creates an “instruction dichotomy” in the brain. The brain is actually receiving two
instructions at once. While one part of
the brain is processing the word with one meaning, subconsciously, another
meaning is being absorbed, affecting the individual’s “value” attached with the
meaning of whatever is being said. One
word that illustrates this process, this schism in the brain – perhaps the most
powerful in since the Industrial Revolution – is the word <span style="font-family: Stencil;">WORK</span>.<o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
"Work" actually has several definitions, but the definitions we are concerned with are the two main definitions:<br />
<br />
Work: (to act or operate effectively: <i>The pump will not work. The plan works.),</i> meaning to function (to perform a specified action or activity; work; operate: <i>the computer isn't functioning now. He rarely functions before noon.), </i>and ...<br />
<br />
Work, as it is used to mean employment: (Work: to be employed, especially as a means of earning one's livelihood: <i>He hasn't worked for six weeks.</i>)<br />
<br />
[A third meaning: to toil, labor, perform, is also relevant -- actually derived from <i>werk</i>, the old English original meaning -- and will be addressed, but keep the first two in mind for now. Obviously, a con man "working" a mark and other such definitions are negligible.]<br />
<br />
*<i> "Employ," itself, means "to use," so by definition, one who is employed is being "used."</i><br />
<i><br /></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
As we
are learning the language, we are introduced to the term “Work” as
“Functioning,” as in, “it <b>works</b>” and
“it’s <b>working</b>.” Conversely, by definition, if it doesn’t ”<b>work</b>,” then it is not functioning and must
be “<b><span style="font-family: 'Bradley Hand ITC'; font-size: 16pt; line-height: 115%;">BROKEN!</span></b>”<b> <o:p></o:p></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Now, when we introduce a second meaning of work, in
this case, “EMPLOYED,” you find phrases such as, “I work,” meaning, “I am
employed.” So, in this sense, if a
person is employed (i.e., has a J-O-B), the person is <span style="font-family: 'Bradley Hand ITC'; font-size: 16pt; line-height: 115%;">“<b>WORKING</b>.” </span>By the intrinsic
connection with the meaning above, it is implied to the subconscious that if a
person is not employed, does not have a J-O-B, then he or she is NOT “WORKING”
and therefore is “BROKEN.”<o:p></o:p><br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Despite your Kulturization, being “employed” is NOT a
natural state for man. This is an idea
developed in response to (or as a function of) the Industrial Revolution. What is a functioning human, after all? A functioning human breathes, eats, sleeps,
reproduces; a functioning human is healthy, has no disease. Of course, there are higher functions: a
functioning human being thinks, reasons, observes; a functioning human loves, feels
compassion, socializes; a functioning human being is curious, inventive, and
driven. None of these are requirements
for the “functioning-working” person in Industry.</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://hmmm.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/mae_sot_factory.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-align: center;"><img border="0" src="http://hmmm.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/mae_sot_factory.jpg" height="214" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Yet, when someone asks you if you are “working,” the
immediate assumption is that you are being asked if you are “employed.” Therein lies the MAGIC. If you are unemployed, the typical response
is derision or sympathy. The
psychological connection between unemployed and broken is a neural association that
runs deep in our Kulture. Through social
pressure and even one’s own guilt due to the association with being broken in
some way if you don’t have a J-O-B, billions of worker bees buzz off to the
hive without questioning the necessity, viability, immorality, or injustice of
the Industrial paradigm.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
It’s been magically connected in your head that if you
are not working then you are broken; <i>ipso
facto</i>, the entire Industrial system must also “work” because if it didn’t,
YOU wouldn’t be broken if you didn’t participate. It is truly a case of “the slaves becoming
the slave drivers,” even to themselves, and the One Word Spell has a
significant influence to this end. In
this way, the word “work” is a form of <span style="font-family: Algerian;">circular reasoning</span>,
a logical fallacy. By defining a word
thusly, it operates within the human brain as a self-perpetuating <i><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Petitio Principii.</span></i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<i><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>*And what happens if you don’t participate? You become <span style="font-family: 'Bradley Hand ITC'; font-size: 14pt; line-height: 115%;">BROKE</span>
because you have no money. This idea is
doubly reinforced with the slang term, making the magic all the more obvious.</i><o:p></o:p><br />
<i><br /></i>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://www.expandmywealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/couch-potato.jpg" height="192" width="320" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Ask yourself this question: Just how <span style="font-family: 'Copperplate Gothic Bold', sans-serif;">FUNCTIONING</span>
is a “working” (employed) person?
Typically, the American “working” class man does not read, except
perhaps the sports page; he drinks a lot of beer, and often takes a bunch of
prescribed medication; his diet is a combination of fast food and frozen dinners,
fruits and vegetables are scarce; he is overweight, undernourished, and sleep
deprived; he watches television a lot, and really, really likes really, really
bad music; he stops learning as soon as the state tells him he doesn’t have to
anymore; he has no appreciation for art, unless the “artist shakes her boobs
and booty on MTV; he aligns himself with one of two political parties and let’s
them do his thinking for him; he is usually in a bad marriage and would rather
fantasize about the pornography on his computer than approach a live woman.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
And what about that woman he’s in a bad marriage
with? Let’s take a look …<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<o:p><b><br /></b></o:p></div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: 'Bauhaus 93'; font-size: 14pt; line-height: 115%;"><b>THE “WORKING WOMAN”</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTU7zJJo7k3I3C91A6h3a67gPaOAs_E7NZtYSlU6bicsqvpTTa5OhV5lJiSBlWrXrzNtjJ00ZmhfSLiIkgggM8ugcU28RRVVEQRRBrLLzi_4_ZvZChyyqAkCCtpjo95r6Nlf2uayHj4vYr/s200/woman-working-06.jpg" height="200" width="166" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Bauhaus 93'; font-size: 14pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
There is probably no better example of the
contradictory application of the term “working” for industrial employment than
its use in regard to women. As Spengler
pointed out in <u>Decline of the West</u>, and as is (rather, <i>should </i>be) obvious, the primary role of
women in a culture is that of mother.
However, we live in Kultamerica, and that role has been
compromised. I’m not going to get into
the reasons in this particular article, but it will certainly be a recurring
theme throughout the Kultamerica Blog.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
So …<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Let’s take a look at what our Kulture considers a
“working woman.” This explicitly shows
the blurred lines of “functioning” versus “employed,” and the trickery of
“working” versus “broken.” Take, for example, our Kulture’s IDEAL paradigm, the
woman this Kulture would use as a POSTER BOY for modernity:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
By today’s standards (<b><i>viz.</i></b>, definitions), the
“working-functioning woman” delays becoming a mother long after the onset of
menses, when she is first biologically capable of conceiving. She typically does so by altering her normal
hormonal processes via pharmacological means (contraception*) and only rarely
by abstinence. In fact, the desire to
reproduce isn’t curbed; rather, it is redefined as “sexual desires, sexuality,
libido, etc.,” seemingly as an end in itself, as she engages in years of
pseudo-sexual behavior. This lustful
vacation from reality is disguised as either “practicing” at a “loving”
relationship, or the quest for “the One,” the man she will finally DECIDE to
reproduce with. Meanwhile, becoming a <span style="font-family: Harrington; font-size: 16pt; line-height: 115%;">Mother</span><span style="font-family: 'Edwardian Script ITC'; font-size: 20pt; line-height: 115%;"> </span>is
put aside to pursue other aspirations.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
A spell has been cast upon her, the idea that
industrial slavery is freedom. She is
either “working,” or she is “broken.”
She is convinced that having a career, a paycheck, a mortgage, a car
payment, and a title (<i>i.e.,</i> Manager,
Lawyer, Doctor, Teacher, etc.) her life will have satisfaction,
self-sufficiency, and meaning. These
goals are given greater gravitas than any natural human aspirations. Becoming pregnant or eschewing any other
natural inclinations would “get in the way.” <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
*"<i>birth control" is an intentional misnomer
used by eugenicists to secure your tacit approval of their illicit goal. The accurate term is "contraception." To use the
term “birth control” is to agree with the idea that there are simply too many
useless eaters on the planet whose lives shouldn’t have existed in the first
place; the only answer is to “control” the reproduction of the mASSes.</i><i style="text-align: center;"> </i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
So this “Working Woman” goes to college as a means to
her end, a career. She is trampified by
the college Kulture, whether during this time she becomes a serial monogamist,
a slut, a man-hating prude, or a combination of the three.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgO2EAf8LxpEtFqb235MIeKBNr7mguG2kA-qf0NlDLdOZGzC9o2RC5-EyMWJOHsEKGIbTOwgcXioO3WOmjbiIwbMNklveAOYaClYCN8ZBY0PaJ8A-ONf1TNVl20MHY-BH5RWpO6QnCn7RM/s1600/tramp-stamp-10.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgO2EAf8LxpEtFqb235MIeKBNr7mguG2kA-qf0NlDLdOZGzC9o2RC5-EyMWJOHsEKGIbTOwgcXioO3WOmjbiIwbMNklveAOYaClYCN8ZBY0PaJ8A-ONf1TNVl20MHY-BH5RWpO6QnCn7RM/s200/tramp-stamp-10.jpg" height="150" width="200" /></a></div>
<br />
Often, by the time she graduates from college,
she has terminated the natural, healthy process of pregnancy at least once, often
multiple times. This “Working-functioning”
Woman graduates, sometimes with honors, but rarely honorably … but she has kept
her EYE ON THE PRIZE – that coveted career and paycheck. Thus, she becomes the “Working-employed”
Woman.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
As a “Working-employed” Woman, she is a victim of all
the debt, time theft, and degradation that all “human resources” are subject
to, from the first resume “submission” to retirement. There is little difference between the male
employed industrial slave and her. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
At the point her looks are beginning to fade, and she
notices that the younger girls are getting the attention she once commanded,
she decides it’s time to get married.
She chooses her husband in a fiscally prudent way. There is a checklist. Love and passion have been wasted in the
pseudo-sexual behaviors of her younger years.
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Then comes “working woman” with the baby carriage … </b><o:p></o:p><br />
<b><br /></b>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://heartbeatdoppler.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/pregnan-working-women.jpg" height="176" width="200" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
She “chooses” to have a baby. This “choice” isn’t dictated (sarcasm), it merely
happens to coincide with the time she is secure enough in her slave-job and the
biological window of reproduction in closing.
There has been no thought to the risks of age and pregnancy, though for
years she was very aware of the “risks” of back alley abortions if Roe vs. Wade
were ever overturned, because every woman who got pregnant in such a culture
would run straight for a clothes hanger.
She “works (employed)” during the gestational period, again putting
herself and the development of her child at risk because she read in a working
woman’s magazine that it’s not a problem.
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Once the baby comes, she has exactly six weeks to
bond. She rarely breastfeeds because
it’s “eewy,” and “why do it anyway when it will be a huge hassle when she goes ‘back
to work?’” That’s what Similac is there
for! After six weeks she passes the
infant off to someone else for 10 hours a day.
The government and corporations (is there a difference?) even subsidize
this practice, so she can get back to “work” and not have to be “broken” for
too long. The time she is with her child,
the hours between commute and employment, is spent drained of energy.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Because she has
been so enrapt in her “self” long past the natural time to begin nurturing, the
child is an OBJECT of her muted affection.
It is a play thing, a debit, an accessory. <o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://media.nj.com/business_impact/photo/working-women-childlessjpg-1866107181a7c89a_large.jpg" height="153" width="200" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
After a couple of years, the child is put in
pre-school to begin the institutionalized indoctrination of Industry. In school, that child’s head is filled with
the same one-word spell that its mother’s was.
At home, its alimentary canal is filled with frozen entrees by Stoffer’s,
hot dogs, and gallons of cow milk.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
This is our Kulture’s “WORKING” woman. This is the model we raise our little girls
to aspire to be. We do it in
school. We do it at home. We do it with peers. We have all been cast under the same <b>One Word
Spell. </b><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
For sure, today’s “working woman” more closely
resembles the broken women in Huxley’s <u>Brave New World </u> than an actual “functioning” female human
being who contributes to her society in the vitally important role of mother.<o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi462s9pRPVPY1TMZI63AqyMoN-n9fR0iPPCgYCJSG9DxwRtrOrF95_wUKuh-ymZ5kyACop032a5kzO_e4WaG6CijkYuZatoKT7gYOMTOQI72fOqcyavINWl8ggUWfp7Hzs3xH0hKfLQ_Y/s200/working+women.jpg" height="200" width="150" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
*<i>Anything less would be old fashioned, “it’s the year
2012, after all, not the dark ages!” (another form of Magic is to cast the
recent past as primordial and barbaric, thereby putting the current times at
odds with the “backward thinking” of yesteryear).</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Juxtapose the “working-employed” mother with the unemployed
(viz., not “working” – broken) mother of our Kulture. Whether this occurs because this woman has
not been seduced by the false sense of power that comes with a role in
Industrial Slavery, or, more often “accidentally,” it has become so rare that
instead of just being called “Mother,” it has been further defined, quite
redundantly in my opinion, as “Stay at Home Mom.” <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Let’s assume the more unusual case. When this woman becomes pregnant, she has the
time to prepare for the coming birth.
She is acutely aware of the changes in the life within her. Not stressed and exhausted by the Industrial
world, she can focus on her health needs – rest, nutrition, and dealing with
the emotions of pregnancy. She has the
time and energy to prepare physically and mentally for the coming changes in
her life. The environment, inside and
out, can be calm and peaceful. <o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://www.womenzmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/ways_to_be_a_good_mother_t.jpg" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
When the child is born, she has one J-O-B – to be a <span style="font-family: Harrington; font-size: 18pt; line-height: 115%;">Mother</span>. She bonds with the baby not for six weeks,
but the entire infancy and beyond. She can
truly bond because she hasn’t any looming commitment that will ultimately tear
her away. Ideally, she hasn’t waited
until she’s confronted with perimenopause before bringing this new life into
the world, so her prefrontal cortex isn’t consumed with self-centeredness. She breastfeeds the baby, not for six
minutes but for at least 6 months, and if she’s an extremely good mother, a few
years. <o:p></o:p><br />
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
The child is raised knowing that he or she is valued
over money, title, or position. The
mother takes pride in having the most important J-O-B in the world, that of
Mother. The child’s needs are met,
lovingly, and through this, gains the self-worth needed to have a chance to actualize
as a complete human being. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
But that doesn’t mean she isn’t still under the <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Calligraphy'; font-size: 14pt; line-height: 115%;">Spell
</span>…</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
In our Kulture, the women who decide to raise their
children in lieu of Industrial Servitude are the target of derision, and they
often succumb to the pressure, feeling worth LESS than the “working
mother.” The spell insinuates itself on
even the best intentioned and pure-hearted mothers. The employed mothers are “working” mothers,
so that means she is “<span style="font-family: 'Bradley Hand ITC'; font-size: 14pt; line-height: 115%;">BROKEN</span>.”
Though there is TRUE POWER in raising the next generation, being around
to effect their attitudes, beliefs, mores, and self-esteem, the Kulture around
her constantly proclaims that she is powerless and weak because she doesn’t
receive a paycheck, that she is lazy or useless because she has no corporate position. Woven into this dangerous sophistry is the
One Word Spell: Work, and it’s implied opposite: Broken.<o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://mikadokids.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Help-for-postpartum-depression1.jpg" height="212" width="320" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Copperplate Gothic Bold', sans-serif;"><b>SOME
WILL SEE THE LIGHT</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: 'Copperplate Gothic Bold', sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Now, if anyone were to objectively examine the facts
of this example of the “working” woman versus the “broken” woman, the
adjectives MUST BE reversed. In terms of
Motherhood, the “Working Woman” is actually very BROKEN, and the mother who
does not participate in Industrial Slavery is NOT “broken,” but FUNCTIONING in
her natural role as MOTHER. SHE is the
true “WORKING” Mother.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
This isn’t about women, but about the spell. Whether you agree or disagree that the
WOMAN’S natural role is that of mother is irrelevant. As demonstrated, both the “working” mother
and the “broken” mother are under the influence of the Spell. The state of the women in Kultamerica is
merely a prime example of the effects of the spell that’s been cast. If you doubt that major life philosophies and
decisions could be influenced by a simple word:
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Why did you move your family from New York to
Texas? For work.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Why did you divorce your husband? He wasn’t working.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Why did you wait until you were in your 30s to have a
baby? Because of my work.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Why didn’t you spend enough time with me, dad? I was working.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Algerian; font-size: 14pt; line-height: 115%;"><b>How to Reverse the Curse</b><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="font-family: Algerian; font-size: 14pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Certainly, it’s difficult to change the language when
most people are not only unaware of its power, but have a limited command of
the language to begin with. However, you
can loosen the stranglehold that this particular spell has by minor changes in
the verbiage and choice of words YOU use in your everyday life.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
First, realize the power language has on the conscious
and subconscious life, then ...<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Choose your words carefully:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -0.25in;">
</div>
<ol>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">Take one day and take note of how
many times you hear the word “work” and focus on the meaning that’s intended
and the meanings that could be implied.</span><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;"> </span></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">Eliminate the word “work”
altogether from your own vocabulary.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">Use function, or another word when
you mean to say that something or someone performs a specific action correctly
in terms of its role.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 7pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"> </span><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">Use employment when you are
referring to a J-O-B.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 7pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"> </span><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">Use toil, labor, etc., when you
mean to put in an effort.</span></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 7pt; text-indent: -0.25in;"> </span><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">Be specific when you are explaining
a task (eg., instead of, “I have to ‘work on’ the car today,” say, “I have to
‘fix the brakes,’ or, ‘change the oil.’”</span></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">If are unemployed and and someone
asks if you’re “working,” proudly proclaim, “Yes, I work just</span><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;"> </span><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">fine!”</span></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">If you </span><i style="text-indent: -0.25in;">are</i><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;"> employed and someone asks you if you are “working,” proudly
proclaim, “No, I’M BROKEN!”</span></li>
</ol>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="text-align: justify; text-indent: -0.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
How appealing would the industrial paradigm be if
“work” had remained solely defined as the original English “werk” (to toil,
labor, especially hard labor)? Just how
eager would the Agrarians be to ditch the shovel, hammer, and hoe, give up
their land, and move to the city after the Civil War? What pride would there be in Industrial
Slavery above that of Agricultural Slavery, when the only difference is the
shape and form of the “Massa?”<o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://themarketinganarchist.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/slavery-in-england.png?w=500&h=455" height="291" width="320" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Only when the term “work” is given a positive meaning,
independent upon its true meaning, does the cyclical reasoning bring the mind
to a halt because the brain is lost in an infinite loop of illogic. There’s the magic, boys and girls … Magic in
the form of ONE SINGLE WORD!<o:p></o:p></div>
</div>
Whajonahlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16440976955700081568noreply@blogger.com8